Why not CTR into a branch And RTC in jira that promotes the branch to master?
That way process can continue and those interested can delay promotion to master , without delaying other progress > On Jan 17, 2017, at 12:08 PM, RJ Nowling <[email protected]> wrote: > > I agree with Evans. > > I'll admit that I have been busy with other things (i.e. a new job), hence > part of my silence in the BigTop community. However, I also agree that the > required conversation around new commits made it easier to engage with > others. > > The reduced amount of conversation can also hurt new contributors. > > I believe it is worth discussing returning to the RTC model. > >> On Sun, Jan 15, 2017 at 3:57 AM, Olaf Flebbe <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> Hi Evans, >> >> thanks for picking up the discussion. I have a rather strong opinion >> towards reverting back to RTC, too. >> >> I am miss the discussion a lot. >> >> Thanks >> Olaf >> >> >> >> >>> Am 15.01.2017 um 09:40 schrieb Evans Ye: >>> >>> Hi Bigtopers, >>> >>> A year has pasted since we adopted CTR(Commit then Review) model. >>> I can see some draw back in this journey, hence I'd like to propose we >>> revert the working model back to RTC(Review Then Commit). >>> >>> Let me list down some known problems I can think of. >>> Before I do so, you should know following are not pointing to someone >>> particularly. And these may be bias opinions since I'm silencing for a >>> long >>> while in the community. >>> >>> a). The community has less conversation because there's no +1 required. >>> b). Sometimes Committers are working alone, left the contributors out side >>> of the game. >>> c). Communication is the core of the open source community. Without this >>> it's not fun anymore contributing. >>> >>> When we adopted CTR, we thought that there will be more time for >>> Committers >>> to review and interact with contributors, but turns out there's no time. >>> Maybe we just simply need the guilty back to drive us forward. >>> >>> Any different voice here? >>> >>> >>> 2015-11-25 4:03 GMT+08:00 Konstantin Boudnik <[email protected]>: >>> >>> With ten +1's; one 0's; and none -1's the [VOTE] has passed. Thanks >>>> everyone >>>> for casting yours. >>>> >>>> I will go ahead and update the top-level README file to reflect on this. >>>> >>>> Cheers, >>>> Cos >>>> >>>>> On Sat, Nov 21, 2015 at 11:34AM, Konstantin Boudnik wrote: >>>>> >>>>> Using CTR for the Bigtop project has been discussed, experimented for a >>>>> >>>> few >>>> >>>>> months, and discussed again on this long thread [1] for alomost a year >>>>> >>>> now. The >>>> >>>>> consensus seems to be reached, but because this is a policy change I'd >>>>> >>>> like to >>>> >>>>> bring it up for the vote. >>>>> >>>>> So, please cast your for per the following ledger >>>>> >>>>> [ ] +1, make the CTR policy permanent for the Bigtop project >>>>> [ ] +0, I don't care either way, >>>>> [ ] -1, do not make the CTR policy permanent for the Bigtop project >>>>> >>>> because... >>>> >>>>> >>>>> The vote will be open for at least 72 hours and will be closed on >>>>> >>>> Tuesday, Nov >>>> >>>>> 24 at noon PST. >>>>> >>>>> [1] http://is.gd/TgBovX >>>>> >>>>> Thanks, >>>>> Cos >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>
