Does 25th Aug 9 pm PST (26th Aug 9:30 am IST) work?

On Tue, Aug 23, 2022 at 2:48 AM Battula, Brahma Reddy
<[email protected]> wrote:

> @Masatake Iwasaki ,@Viraj Jasani , @Kengo Seki and others, can we get the
> final conclusion on this..?
>
> Please let me know your availability, Can have one call to discuss on
> this..
>
>
> On 24/07/22, 1:31 AM, "Battula, Brahma Reddy" <[email protected]>
> wrote:
>
>     >  -1 on development in branch.
>      >   It is not worth for maintaining the branch if the modules is so
> small
>       >  and barely updated as explained here.
>       >  It should not conflict to existing code.
>        >  I feel I must check the code before check-in based on this
> thread.
>
>
>     Sure, Viraj or me can show the code to you.
>
>     Can we've call on this Friday/Thrusday if that works..?
>
>
>     On 11/07/22, 11:54 AM, "Masatake Iwasaki" <[email protected]>
> wrote:
>
>         > Sure, we can havemodule name like  bigtop-distro-select.
>         > Initially we'll do this separate branch.
>
>         -1 on development in branch.
>         It is not worth for maintaining the branch if the modules is so
> small
>         and barely updated as explained here.
>         It should not conflict to existing code.
>         I feel I must check the code before check-in based on this thread.
>
>         Masatake Iwasaki
>
>         On 2022/07/11 8:23, Kengo Seki wrote:
>         >> As there are different opinions on this and took long time,
> just to brainstorm all the possibilities and pitfalls.
>         >
>         > Oh, I interpreted your words "conclude" and "finalize" as you
> were
>         > going to make a final decision. Brainstorming is welcome, of
> course.
>         > (But I'm not so sure if all people concerned could join, due to
> time
>         > difference and their schedule, etc.)
>         >
>         >> Can you suggest, how the changes will be also.. like folder,
> where you suggest to keep this...?
>         >
>         > Sure, here's my proposal:
>         >
>         > * Stack name: "BIGTOP"
>         >
>         >    - The same name as the existing one [1]
>         >    - Because it deploys the packages generated by Bigtop
>         >    - The existing stack should be replaced with it, because that
> is
>         > based on Bigtop 0.8 and too old to use now
>         >    - No concern about infringing others' trademark
>         >
>         > * Component/folder name: "bigtop-select"
>         >
>         >    - Consistent naming convention with the existing tools such as
>         > "bigtop-groovy", "bigtop-jsvc", "bigtop-utils" [2]
>         >    - If it sounds too simple and a bit unclear, a more
> descriptive name
>         > might be an option, for example "bigtop-ambari-stack-selector"
>         >
>         > * Script name: "bigtop-select"
>         >
>         >    - Consistent with the stack name
>         >    - No concern about infringing others' trademark
>         >
>         > [1]:
> https://nam10.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fgithub.com%2Fapache%2Fambari%2Ftree%2Frelease-2.7.6%2Fambari-server%2Fsrc%2Fmain%2Fresources%2Fstacks%2FBIGTOP%2F0.8&amp;data=05%7C01%7Cbbattula%40visa.com%7C918f1d660eb946b9883a08da6ce62b67%7C38305e12e15d4ee888b9c4db1c477d76%7C0%7C0%7C637942033097121021%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C3000%7C%7C%7C&amp;sdata=l6OMfWaJl4yKV6zjSYiMQXYy1HBuJhs5nej0Co9K3FA%3D&amp;reserved=0
>         > [2]:
> https://nam10.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fgithub.com%2Fapache%2Fbigtop%2Ftree%2Fmaster%2Fbigtop-packages%2Fsrc%2Fcommon&amp;data=05%7C01%7Cbbattula%40visa.com%7C918f1d660eb946b9883a08da6ce62b67%7C38305e12e15d4ee888b9c4db1c477d76%7C0%7C0%7C637942033097121021%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C3000%7C%7C%7C&amp;sdata=5nM8IrpP067odUjmxS%2Bv8xxDchCLGVOplmA%2Fo8Iq%2BOg%3D&amp;reserved=0
>         >
>         > Kengo Seki <[email protected]>
>         >
>         > On Mon, Jul 11, 2022 at 3:19 AM Battula, Brahma Reddy
>         > <[email protected]> wrote:
>         >>
>         >>>   Technical decisions shouldn't be done on other places than
> public mailing lists,
>         >>>   as described in the "Open Communications" section of [1] and
> [2].
>         >>   > So we should conclude the discussion in this mailing list.
>         >>   > (And with my poor English, I'm not so confident to catch up
> with your
>         >>    > fluent talk ;)
>         >>
>         >> I believe , I knew the apache way which you mentioned. We are
> not going conclude anything which comes to bigtop other than this mailing
> list.
>         >> As there are different opinions on this and took long time,
> just to brainstorm all the possibilities and pitfalls. Hence  asking let's
> have  call so that we can brainstorm. Even after call, everything will be
> published what we discussed.
>         >>
>         >> I think, whiteboarding will help to catch up with you.
>         >>
>         >> You all the think "bigtop-select" will be best option right..?
> Can you suggest, how the changes will be also.. like folder, where you
> suggest to keep this...?
>         >>
>         >> And if the name represents the stack which we are going to
> deploy should fine I feel.. (if it's not BDP, may be
> OBDP:OpensourceBigDataPlatform.)
>         >>
>         >> @Viraj Jasani and others any thoughts..?
>         >>
>         >>
>         >> On 10/07/22, 11:03 AM, "Kengo Seki" <[email protected]> wrote:
>         >>
>         >>      > Looks we had so much discussed here, Let's try to
> conclude. Can we've one call on this and finalize this..?
>         >>
>         >>      Technical decisions shouldn't be done on other places than
> public mailing lists,
>         >>      as described in the "Open Communications" section of [1]
> and [2].
>         >>      So we should conclude the discussion in this mailing list.
>         >>      (And with my poor English, I'm not so confident to catch
> up with your
>         >>      fluent talk ;)
>         >>
>         >>      > FYI. Even looks bigtop used some where also..
>         >>
>         >>      Bigtop is ASF's trademark as you can see in the "Apache
> Bigtop®
>         >>      software" section of [3].
>         >>      So it doesn't have the risk of trademark infringement.
>         >>
>         >>      [1]:
> https://nam10.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.apache.org%2Ftheapacheway%2Findex.html%23what-makes-the-apache-way-so-hard-to-define&amp;data=05%7C01%7Cbbattula%40visa.com%7C918f1d660eb946b9883a08da6ce62b67%7C38305e12e15d4ee888b9c4db1c477d76%7C0%7C0%7C637942033097121021%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C3000%7C%7C%7C&amp;sdata=zaDwUjNvgU0eP5NY7wPq2BISd%2FiLs7dp92fwFUfwFCI%3D&amp;reserved=0
>         >>      [2]:
> https://nam10.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.apache.org%2Fdev%2Fpmc.html%23mailing-list-naming-policy&amp;data=05%7C01%7Cbbattula%40visa.com%7C918f1d660eb946b9883a08da6ce62b67%7C38305e12e15d4ee888b9c4db1c477d76%7C0%7C0%7C637942033097277244%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C3000%7C%7C%7C&amp;sdata=DlCOz5ajX%2FziXmx7ZeD5xa0WzX06Akm3pYuMs5KX9h4%3D&amp;reserved=0
>         >>      [3]:
> https://nam10.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.apache.org%2Ffoundation%2Fmarks%2Flist%2F&amp;data=05%7C01%7Cbbattula%40visa.com%7C918f1d660eb946b9883a08da6ce62b67%7C38305e12e15d4ee888b9c4db1c477d76%7C0%7C0%7C637942033097277244%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C3000%7C%7C%7C&amp;sdata=KVc1YjBSUzAFexYTQ2IoiLOr0vkm85NBqI8WZC7g67s%3D&amp;reserved=0
>         >>
>         >>      Kengo Seki <[email protected]>
>         >>
>         >>      On Sun, Jul 10, 2022 at 4:11 AM Battula, Brahma Reddy
>         >>      <[email protected]> wrote:
>         >>      >
>         >>      > Looks we had so much discussed here, Let's try to
> conclude. Can we've one call on this and finalize this..?
>         >>      >
>         >>      > FYI. Even looks bigtop used some where[1] also..
>         >>      > 1.
> https://nam10.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fen.wikipedia.org%2Fwiki%2FBigtop_&amp;data=05%7C01%7Cbbattula%40visa.com%7C918f1d660eb946b9883a08da6ce62b67%7C38305e12e15d4ee888b9c4db1c477d76%7C0%7C0%7C637942033097277244%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C3000%7C%7C%7C&amp;sdata=%2BPQQCUDhl%2BHGNS%2F1aLtS38Qah9zDs06qd2y%2B%2BUE%2FBKk%3D&amp;reserved=0(Microsoft_product)
>         >>      >
>         >>      >
>         >>      > On 08/07/22, 8:06 PM, "Kengo Seki" <[email protected]>
> wrote:
>         >>      >
>         >>      >     Thank you for your explanation, Brahma.
>         >>      >     CRH (abbreviation of "CHINA REDOOP HYPERLOOP" [1])
> is supposed to be a
>         >>      >     trademark of Redoop, so they can name the script
> crh-select without
>         >>      >     problem.
>         >>      >     But regarding BDP for example, I can easily find
> products that have
>         >>      >     the same name [2][3][4] as you already mentioned, so
> I'd like to
>         >>      >     recommend bigtop-select for avoiding unnecessary
> trouble.
>         >>      >     Or, a single and more general word just like
> conf-select may be less
>         >>      >     troublesome than bdp. How about "stack-select", for
> example?
>         >>      >
>         >>      >     [1]:
> https://nam10.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fdocs.redoop.com%2F&amp;data=05%7C01%7Cbbattula%40visa.com%7C918f1d660eb946b9883a08da6ce62b67%7C38305e12e15d4ee888b9c4db1c477d76%7C0%7C0%7C637942033097277244%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C3000%7C%7C%7C&amp;sdata=CM8y%2Bom6hpEl98x8G2ve5J98W%2FVeEkSPnwgFiYd2C98%3D&amp;reserved=0
>         >>      >     [2]:
> https://nam10.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fdatumstudio.jp%2Fen%2Fbigdataplatform%2F&amp;data=05%7C01%7Cbbattula%40visa.com%7C918f1d660eb946b9883a08da6ce62b67%7C38305e12e15d4ee888b9c4db1c477d76%7C0%7C0%7C637942033097277244%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C3000%7C%7C%7C&amp;sdata=g2ng5E0%2BTb6N52isJ7guO10C3zTGA86dSafV9h0LXbU%3D&amp;reserved=0
>         >>      >     [3]:
> https://nam10.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fhelp.talend.com%2Fr%2Fen-US%2F8.0%2Fstudio-getting-started-guide-big-data-platform%2Fintroduction&amp;data=05%7C01%7Cbbattula%40visa.com%7C918f1d660eb946b9883a08da6ce62b67%7C38305e12e15d4ee888b9c4db1c477d76%7C0%7C0%7C637942033097277244%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C3000%7C%7C%7C&amp;sdata=qrU%2F4FJ5EjqoD0opzxVL1wM%2FTEM%2B%2B8MoqkZHHZNA%2Fk0%3D&amp;reserved=0
>         >>      >     [4]:
> https://nam10.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.harmony-alliance.eu%2Fbigdata-platform%2Fbig-data-platform&amp;data=05%7C01%7Cbbattula%40visa.com%7C918f1d660eb946b9883a08da6ce62b67%7C38305e12e15d4ee888b9c4db1c477d76%7C0%7C0%7C637942033097277244%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C3000%7C%7C%7C&amp;sdata=KfEGcZwpdvVZUaW1XsaUMGqVYcZyysmZhjl%2BR6Iq2wI%3D&amp;reserved=0
>         >>      >
>         >>      >     Kengo Seki <[email protected]>
>         >>      >
>         >>      >     On Fri, Jul 8, 2022 at 2:51 AM Battula, Brahma Reddy
> <[email protected]> wrote:
>         >>      >     >
>         >>      >     >     >Do you mean that you're going to name the
> module (same as "component"
>         >>      >     >     >in the Bigtop terminology, I think)
> bigtop-distro-select,
>         >>      >     >     >and still the script in question bdp-select?
> If so, is there any
>         >>      >     >     >reason that the script must be that name?
>         >>      >     >     >(No offence, I just want to understand your
> thoughts and its
>         >>      >     >     >background, and avoid the conflict or user's
> confusion with existing
>         >>      >     >     >trademarks or products)
>         >>      >     >
>         >>      >     > Thanks @Kengo Seki for consolidating all the
> concerns. Name should represent the stack which includes all the components
> hence planning to have like bdp,bds...and this only one file like below[1]
> which has done redoop.
>         >>      >     >
>         >>      >     >
>         >>      >     >
> https://nam10.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fgithub.com%2Fredoop%2Fbigtop%2Ftree%2Fe5f9fe81773180159d291f18ec366ac8bfa4d6d2%2Fbigtop-packages%2Fsrc%2Fcommon%2Fambari-mpacks%2Fselector&amp;data=05%7C01%7Cbbattula%40visa.com%7C918f1d660eb946b9883a08da6ce62b67%7C38305e12e15d4ee888b9c4db1c477d76%7C0%7C0%7C637942033097277244%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C3000%7C%7C%7C&amp;sdata=e4oze4857dGtVIq14Ow8yzFnDhW9b2OG85sJMWfXbi4%3D&amp;reserved=0
>         >>      >     >
>         >>      >     >
>         >>      >     > On 07/07/22, 6:07 AM, "Kengo Seki" <
> [email protected]> wrote:
>         >>      >     >
>         >>      >     >     The following concern Masatake mentioned
> before is an important point,
>         >>      >     >     so I talked to Brahma for clarifying his
> intention on the ASF Slack
>         >>      >     >     yesterday.
>         >>      >     >
>         >>      >     >     > Multiple versions of the same package
> (deb/rpm) can not be installed at the same time.
>         >>      >     >     > IIRC, HDP uses convention in which the
> product version is part of package name
>         >>      >     >     > for addressing this.
>         >>      >     >
>         >>      >     >     > I don't like to bring the awkward package
> name convention to Bigtop
>         >>      >     >     > at least by default.
>         >>      >     >
>         >>      >     >     He's planning to adopt the same mitigation as
> HDP for now, but he
>         >>      >     >     doesn't intend to change the default package
> naming convention of
>         >>      >     >     Bigtop,
>         >>      >     >     but just add a new functionality to include an
> extra part into the
>         >>      >     >     package name for avoiding conflict, which is
> disabled by default.
>         >>      >     >
>         >>      >     >     And Brahma, let me confirm about the following
> reply:
>         >>      >     >
>         >>      >     >     > Sure, we can have module name like
> bigtop-distro-select.
>         >>      >     >
>         >>      >     >     Do you mean that you're going to name the
> module (same as "component"
>         >>      >     >     in the Bigtop terminology, I think)
> bigtop-distro-select,
>         >>      >     >     and still the script in question bdp-select?
> If so, is there any
>         >>      >     >     reason that the script must be that name?
>         >>      >     >     (No offence, I just want to understand your
> thoughts and its
>         >>      >     >     background, and avoid the conflict or user's
> confusion with existing
>         >>      >     >     trademarks or products)
>         >>      >     >
>         >>      >     >     Kengo Seki <[email protected]>
>         >>      >     >
>         >>      >     >     On Thu, Jul 7, 2022 at 2:08 AM Battula, Brahma
> Reddy
>         >>      >     >     <[email protected]> wrote:
>         >>      >     >     >
>         >>      >     >     > >   The name of stack based no Bigtop should
> be Bigtop.
>         >>      >     >     >   >   If you can not accept the name like
> bigtop-*, the work should done outside of Bigtop.
>         >>      >     >     >   >  I will cast -1 if someone submit a
> patch to add a module with the name spoiling branding.
>         >>      >     >     >
>         >>      >     >     > Sure, we can have module name like
> bigtop-distro-select.
>         >>      >     >     > Initially we'll do this separate branch.
>         >>      >     >     >
>         >>      >     >     >
>         >>      >     >     >
>         >>      >     >     > On 06/07/22, 8:55 AM, "Masatake Iwasaki" <
> [email protected]> wrote:
>         >>      >     >     >
>         >>      >     >     >     > I believe it's for project name. isn't
> it.?
>         >>      >     >     >
>         >>      >     >     >     projects and products.
>         >>      >     >     >
>         >>      >     >     >     > IMO, We need to create folders and
> refer stacknames so ambari-select,bigtop-select wn't looks good.
>         >>      >     >     >
>         >>      >     >     >     The name of stack based no Bigtop should
> be Bigtop.
>         >>      >     >     >     If you can not accept the name like
> bigtop-*, the work should done outside of Bigtop.
>         >>      >     >     >     I will cast -1 if someone submit a patch
> to add a module with the name spoiling branding.
>         >>      >     >     >
>         >>      >     >     >
>         >>      >     >     >     On 2022/07/06 11:44, Battula, Brahma
> Reddy wrote:
>         >>      >     >     >     >
>         >>      >     >     >     > I believe it's for project name. isn't
> it.?
>         >>      >     >     >     >
>         >>      >     >     >     >
>         >>      >     >     >     > On 06/07/22, 7:27 AM, "Masatake
> Iwasaki" <[email protected]> wrote:
>         >>      >     >     >     >
>         >>      >     >     >     >      > But As we are not releasing as
> enterprise should be fine I think. IMO, We need to create folders and refer
> stacknames so ambari-select,bigtop-select wn't looks good.
>         >>      >     >     >     >
>         >>      >     >     >     >      Not fine.
>         >>      >     >     >     >      We have a trademark policy.
>         >>      >     >     >     >
> https://nam10.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.apache.org%2Ffoundation%2Fmarks%2F&amp;data=05%7C01%7Cbbattula%40visa.com%7C918f1d660eb946b9883a08da6ce62b67%7C38305e12e15d4ee888b9c4db1c477d76%7C0%7C0%7C637942033097277244%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C3000%7C%7C%7C&amp;sdata=Aj5p2h78PdIXFHsJi7Q6ouR5eG33vf1LA2wdGnlaF%2FQ%3D&amp;reserved=0
>         >>      >     >     >     >
>         >>      >     >     >     >      On 2022/07/06 10:37, Battula,
> Brahma Reddy wrote:
>         >>      >     >     >     >      >> Should we avoid unrecognized
> brand which may be trademark of someone?
>         >>      >     >     >     >      >> ambari-select or bigtop-select
> should be enough.
>         >>      >     >     >     >      >
>         >>      >     >     >     >      > Not sure, where to confirm
> whether there is already trademark. When I googled found so many.
>         >>      >     >     >     >      > But As we are not releasing as
> enterprise should be fine I think. IMO, We need to create folders and refer
> stacknames so ambari-select,bigtop-select wn't looks good.
>         >>      >     >     >     >      > May be you can refer the
> initial proposal [2] where I mentioned some more names.
> (BDS-BigDataStack,OSS-OpenSourceSelect..)
>         >>      >     >     >     >      >
>         >>      >     >     >     >      > Finally thanks a bunch for long
> healthy discussions on this. Mostly we all same page now.
>         >>      >     >     >     >      >
>         >>      >     >     >     >      > 1.
> https://nam10.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.google.com%2Fsearch%3Fq%3Dbdp%26safe%3Dactive%26sxsrf%3DALiCzsaQDcQS0gb8KbAMfjadXuG-jomxRQ%253A1657070844287%26ei%3D_OTEYsuWEYrD4-EPp4uKqAE%26ved%3D0ahUKEwjLhKr4jeP4AhWK4TgGHaeFAhUQ4dUDCA4%26uact%3D5%26oq%3Dbdp%26gs_lcp%3DCgdnd3Mtd2l6EAMyBAgjECcyBAgjECcyCggAELEDEIMBEEMyCwgAEIAEELEDEIMBMgsIABCABBCxAxCDATIRCC4QgAQQsQMQgwEQxwEQ0QMyBQgAEIAEMgUIABCABDIFCAAQgAQyBQgAEIAEOgcIABBHELADOgYIABAeEBY6CggAEB4QDxAWEAo6CggAEIAEEIcCEBQ6CwguEIAEEMcBEK8BOgcIABCABBAKOhYILhCABBCHAhCxAxCDARDHARDRAxAUSgQIQRgASgQIRhgAUKsHWNgRYLoWaAFwAXgAgAGoAYgBtAeSAQMwLjiYAQCgAQHIAQjAAQE%26sclient%3Dgws-wiz&amp;data=05%7C01%7Cbbattula%40visa.com%7C918f1d660eb946b9883a08da6ce62b67%7C38305e12e15d4ee888b9c4db1c477d76%7C0%7C0%7C637942033097277244%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C3000%7C%7C%7C&amp;sdata=p1br7DcndgZq6Z5m4CvTSZOSFhkKtie%2BeqXERXuY58Q%3D&amp;reserved=0
>         >>      >     >     >     >      >
>         >>      >     >     >     >      > 2.
> https://nam10.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Flists.apache.org%2Fthread%2Fm77lhzo0njr2dhoock5twtm0c19j2py8&amp;data=05%7C01%7Cbbattula%40visa.com%7C918f1d660eb946b9883a08da6ce62b67%7C38305e12e15d4ee888b9c4db1c477d76%7C0%7C0%7C637942033097277244%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C3000%7C%7C%7C&amp;sdata=EON1ukunh1oyFb5HID57FuOv9DjIBteeoCYuQfx34Gg%3D&amp;reserved=0
>         >>      >     >     >     >      >
>         >>      >     >     >     >      >
>         >>      >     >     >     >      > On 06/07/22, 4:01 AM, "Masatake
> Iwasaki" <[email protected]> wrote:
>         >>      >     >     >     >      >
>         >>      >     >     >     >      >      > We have still not
> officially finalized the new replacement name for
>         >>      >     >     >     >      >      > hdp-select, it would
> likely be bdp-select (bdp: BigData Platform). However,
>         >>      >     >     >     >      >      > the purpose of
> bdp-select and conf-select remains the same.
>         >>      >     >     >     >      >
>         >>      >     >     >     >      >      Should we avoid
> unrecognized brand which may be trademark of someone?
>         >>      >     >     >     >      >      ambari-select or
> bigtop-select should be enough.
>         >>      >     >     >     >      >
>         >>      >     >     >     >      >      On 2022/06/29 13:52, Viraj
> Jasani wrote:
>         >>      >     >     >     >      >      > Hi Ambari/Bigtop dev,
>         >>      >     >     >     >      >      >
>         >>      >     >     >     >      >      > As per the new roadmap
> of Apache Ambari, we would like to propose moving
>         >>      >     >     >     >      >      > certain scripts
> (previously known as hdp-select and conf-select) to Bigtop
>         >>      >     >     >     >      >      > so that their rpm
> installation could be managed independently.
>         >>      >     >     >     >      >      > These scripts are a
> basic necessity in the Ambari framework for the
>         >>      >     >     >     >      >      > installation of various
> Bigdata packages. The only major changes they would
>         >>      >     >     >     >      >      > receive is when we
> onboard new services and components to Ambari, else they
>         >>      >     >     >     >      >      > usually do not receive
> updates. In the past, we used to get hdp-select rpm
>         >>      >     >     >     >      >      > downloaded and installed
> from HDP repositories.
>         >>      >     >     >     >      >      >
>         >>      >     >     >     >      >      > We have still not
> officially finalized the new replacement name for
>         >>      >     >     >     >      >      > hdp-select, it would
> likely be bdp-select (bdp: BigData Platform). However,
>         >>      >     >     >     >      >      > the purpose of
> bdp-select and conf-select remains the same.
>         >>      >     >     >     >      >      >
>         >>      >     >     >     >      >
>         >>      >     >     >     >
>         >>      >     >     >
>         >>      >     >     >
>         >>      >     >     >
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>         >>      >     >     > To unsubscribe, e-mail:
> [email protected]
>         >>      >     >     > For additional commands, e-mail:
> [email protected]
>         >>      >     >     >
>         >>      >     >
>         >>      >     >
>  ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>         >>      >     >     To unsubscribe, e-mail:
> [email protected]
>         >>      >     >     For additional commands, e-mail:
> [email protected]
>         >>      >     >
>         >>      >     >
>         >>      >
>         >>      >
>  ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>         >>      >     To unsubscribe, e-mail:
> [email protected]
>         >>      >     For additional commands, e-mail:
> [email protected]
>         >>      >
>         >>      >
>         >>
>         >>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>         >>      To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
>         >>      For additional commands, e-mail:
> [email protected]
>         >>
>         >>
>
>
>     ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>     To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
>     For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
>
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
>
>

Reply via email to