Who is in charge now? On 11/22/06, Louis Suarez-Potts <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 2006-11-22, at 12:42 , Sherman Boyd wrote: > On 11/22/06, Louis Suarez-Potts <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> Sorry, i disagree. I am really opposed to bureaucracy unless it is >> really needed. This list is fine as a forum for working on a useful >> policy. That should take very little time. I've already sketched out >> the framework, the rest are fairly minor details that we can post > > Perhaps it doesn't need to be a board then, but I do think if members > have to pay to join then they should have the right to elect leaders. Uhm. Right now, I want to put in place a policy. That policy can always change as the situation demands. Us does not require a "board," which I see as needless bureaucracy. And I do not see the connection between paying to be listed--essentially paying for OOo's webspace--and leaders. Rather, I see that as any paying or nonpaying member of that list is a member of this mail list and thus has a voice, there is no need of a separate chamber of leaders with authority. I > > > -- > Best regards, > > Sherman Boyd best, louis
-- Best regards, Sherman Boyd --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
