If anyone has any objections to the plan, it can turn to discussion. I'd like to get these out ASAP though, since without them, our guarantees are broken.
-Ivan On Thu, Dec 4, 2014 at 5:25 PM, Flavio Junqueira < [email protected]> wrote: > This should be a discussion rather than a vote, no? The plan sounds good. > About RMing, Sijie is the default RM because he released 4.3.0. If he > doesn't want to do it, then I can give it a shot. > -Flavio > > On Thursday, December 4, 2014 4:09 PM, Ivan Kelly <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > > Hi folks, > > Now that the source has been moved, we can start developing again :D > > We also need to think about upcoming releases. There have been two critical > bugs found in the past 2 weeks, BOOKKEEPER-799 and BOOKKEEPER-815. > > IMO, we should get releases out which include the fixes for these as soon > as possible. The question is which branches should we cut releases for? > > We currently have 3 active branches. master, branch-4.3 and branch-4.2. I > propose we make 2 releases, 4.3.1 and 4.2.4, containing the critical fixes > mentioned above. > > Any volunteers for release manager? Keep in mind that there will be a new > workflow for the release, so you'll also need to update > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/BOOKKEEPER/Creating+a+release > as you go along. > > I can take 4.2.4 since I did the last release on that branch anyhow. > > Regards > Ivan > > > > >
