Unless someone else wants to take 4.2.4?

On Fri, Dec 5, 2014 at 10:37 AM, Ivan Kelly <[email protected]> wrote:

> Yup, that's correct.
>
> On Thu, Dec 4, 2014 at 7:35 PM, Sijie Guo <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> I can take it. Per my understanding on this thread, Ivan will take 4.2.4,
>> I
>> take 4.3.1, right?
>>
>> - Sijie
>>
>> On Thu, Dec 4, 2014 at 8:34 AM, Ivan Kelly <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>> > If anyone has any objections to the plan, it can turn to discussion.
>> >
>> > I'd like to get these out ASAP though, since without them, our
>> guarantees
>> > are broken.
>> >
>> > -Ivan
>> >
>> > On Thu, Dec 4, 2014 at 5:25 PM, Flavio Junqueira <
>> > [email protected]> wrote:
>> >
>> > > This should be a discussion rather than a vote, no? The plan sounds
>> good.
>> > > About RMing, Sijie is the default RM because he released 4.3.0. If he
>> > > doesn't want to do it, then I can give it a shot.
>> > > -Flavio
>> > >
>> > >      On Thursday, December 4, 2014 4:09 PM, Ivan Kelly <
>> [email protected]
>> > >
>> > > wrote:
>> > >
>> > >
>> > >
>> > >  Hi folks,
>> > >
>> > > Now that the source has been moved, we can start developing again :D
>> > >
>> > > We also need to think about upcoming releases. There have been two
>> > critical
>> > > bugs found in the past 2 weeks, BOOKKEEPER-799 and BOOKKEEPER-815.
>> > >
>> > > IMO, we should get releases out which include the fixes for these as
>> soon
>> > > as possible. The question is which branches should we cut releases
>> for?
>> > >
>> > > We currently have 3 active branches. master, branch-4.3 and
>> branch-4.2. I
>> > > propose we make 2 releases, 4.3.1 and 4.2.4, containing the critical
>> > fixes
>> > > mentioned above.
>> > >
>> > > Any volunteers for release manager? Keep in mind that there will be a
>> new
>> > > workflow for the release, so you'll also need to update
>> > >
>> >
>> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/BOOKKEEPER/Creating+a+release
>> > > as you go along.
>> > >
>> > > I can take 4.2.4 since I did the last release on that branch anyhow.
>> > >
>> > > Regards
>> > > Ivan
>> > >
>> > >
>> > >
>> > >
>> > >
>> >
>>
>
>

Reply via email to