I can take it. Per my understanding on this thread, Ivan will take 4.2.4, I take 4.3.1, right?
- Sijie On Thu, Dec 4, 2014 at 8:34 AM, Ivan Kelly <[email protected]> wrote: > If anyone has any objections to the plan, it can turn to discussion. > > I'd like to get these out ASAP though, since without them, our guarantees > are broken. > > -Ivan > > On Thu, Dec 4, 2014 at 5:25 PM, Flavio Junqueira < > [email protected]> wrote: > > > This should be a discussion rather than a vote, no? The plan sounds good. > > About RMing, Sijie is the default RM because he released 4.3.0. If he > > doesn't want to do it, then I can give it a shot. > > -Flavio > > > > On Thursday, December 4, 2014 4:09 PM, Ivan Kelly <[email protected] > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > Hi folks, > > > > Now that the source has been moved, we can start developing again :D > > > > We also need to think about upcoming releases. There have been two > critical > > bugs found in the past 2 weeks, BOOKKEEPER-799 and BOOKKEEPER-815. > > > > IMO, we should get releases out which include the fixes for these as soon > > as possible. The question is which branches should we cut releases for? > > > > We currently have 3 active branches. master, branch-4.3 and branch-4.2. I > > propose we make 2 releases, 4.3.1 and 4.2.4, containing the critical > fixes > > mentioned above. > > > > Any volunteers for release manager? Keep in mind that there will be a new > > workflow for the release, so you'll also need to update > > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/BOOKKEEPER/Creating+a+release > > as you go along. > > > > I can take 4.2.4 since I did the last release on that branch anyhow. > > > > Regards > > Ivan > > > > > > > > > > >
