Hey John. So if I'm understanding correctly this PR, this is to install the CLI via brew right? So why not using a simple brooklyn-cli?
Best On Mon, 23 May 2016, 08:53 John McCabe, <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi All, > > I've currently got a pull request in against Homebrew/homebrew-core#1326 > <https://github.com/Homebrew/homebrew-core/issues/1326> to add the > Brooklyn > CLI to brew. > > There's a reluctance however to add a `br` alias due to it being 'too > generic', one alternative is to just go with the repo name - for example: > > brew install brooklyn-client > > This would still install the br cli. > > The current dist archive is `apache-brooklyn-client-cli` for example > (stripping the version out), I don't see a dedicated RPM/Deb for the client > but assume it would follow the same convention (* as an aside, is the -cli > really necessary, do we expect to distribute other clients?) > > Any suggestions/objections on the above alternative? > > /John > > ps. What is the status of getting linux packages into Debian/Fedora repos > etc? What package naming will be used. > -- Thomas Bouron • Software Engineer @ Cloudsoft Corporation • http://www.cloudsoftcorp.com/ Github: https://github.com/tbouron Twitter: https://twitter.com/eltibouron
