"brooklyn-cli" also sounds good to me Geoff
———————————————————— Gnu PGP key - http://is.gd/TTTTuI > On 23 May 2016, at 08:59, John McCabe <[email protected]> wrote: > > I like that ! > > On Mon, 23 May 2016 at 08:58 Thomas Bouron <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> Hey John. >> >> So if I'm understanding correctly this PR, this is to install the CLI via >> brew right? So why not using a simple brooklyn-cli? >> >> Best >> >> On Mon, 23 May 2016, 08:53 John McCabe, <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> Hi All, >>> >>> I've currently got a pull request in against Homebrew/homebrew-core#1326 >>> <https://github.com/Homebrew/homebrew-core/issues/1326> to add the >>> Brooklyn >>> CLI to brew. >>> >>> There's a reluctance however to add a `br` alias due to it being 'too >>> generic', one alternative is to just go with the repo name - for example: >>> >>> brew install brooklyn-client >>> >>> This would still install the br cli. >>> >>> The current dist archive is `apache-brooklyn-client-cli` for example >>> (stripping the version out), I don't see a dedicated RPM/Deb for the >> client >>> but assume it would follow the same convention (* as an aside, is the >> -cli >>> really necessary, do we expect to distribute other clients?) >>> >>> Any suggestions/objections on the above alternative? >>> >>> /John >>> >>> ps. What is the status of getting linux packages into Debian/Fedora repos >>> etc? What package naming will be used. >>> >> -- >> >> Thomas Bouron • Software Engineer @ Cloudsoft Corporation • >> http://www.cloudsoftcorp.com/ >> Github: https://github.com/tbouron >> Twitter: https://twitter.com/eltibouron >>
