@richard kicked it off myself at the weekend as I was installing br and figured I'd take a look at whats involved in getting it added to brew.
re: metadata/attribution etc, what do you propose? On Mon, 23 May 2016 at 10:08 Richard Downer <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi all, > > Catching up on this. As John mentioned I chipped in to the discussion on > Gitter before I saw this thread. > > I'm "+1" on `apache-brooklyn-cli`, and -1 on *anything* that is not > prefixed `apache-brooklyn-`. > > The reason for this is, with my PMC hat on, I am responsible for making > sure that our trademarks are used correctly. If we fail to use our own > trademarks correctly, we risk losing them. So the same goes for .debs and > .rpms (I know in the last release the .rpm was correctly named which is > good, but I haven't looked at the .deb build to check that). > > Another question. Who is running this? With all due respect to John, he is > not (yet!) on the Brooklyn PMC so this effort is not officially part of the > Brooklyn project. Now there's absolutely nothing wrong with that - we are > open source, and what John is doing is 100% permitted by the license - but > it may need to be clear in the metadata that this is John's work, not > Apache's. > > Richard. > > > On 23 May 2016 at 09:50, John McCabe <[email protected]> wrote: > > > Some feedback from @rdowner is that we should include the apache > branding, > > so current favourite is: > > > > brew install apache-brooklyn-cli > > > > Note that by way of a comparison, Apache Spark is in brew as `brew > install > > apache-spark`, so I'm inclined to go with the suggestion above. > > > > On Mon, 23 May 2016 at 09:20 Geoff Macartney < > > [email protected]> wrote: > > > > > "brooklyn-cli" also sounds good to me > > > > > > Geoff > > > > > > ———————————————————— > > > Gnu PGP key - http://is.gd/TTTTuI > > > > > > > > > > On 23 May 2016, at 08:59, John McCabe <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > > > I like that ! > > > > > > > > On Mon, 23 May 2016 at 08:58 Thomas Bouron < > > > [email protected]> > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > >> Hey John. > > > >> > > > >> So if I'm understanding correctly this PR, this is to install the > CLI > > > via > > > >> brew right? So why not using a simple brooklyn-cli? > > > >> > > > >> Best > > > >> > > > >> On Mon, 23 May 2016, 08:53 John McCabe, <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > >> > > > >>> Hi All, > > > >>> > > > >>> I've currently got a pull request in against > > > Homebrew/homebrew-core#1326 > > > >>> <https://github.com/Homebrew/homebrew-core/issues/1326> to add the > > > >>> Brooklyn > > > >>> CLI to brew. > > > >>> > > > >>> There's a reluctance however to add a `br` alias due to it being > 'too > > > >>> generic', one alternative is to just go with the repo name - for > > > example: > > > >>> > > > >>> brew install brooklyn-client > > > >>> > > > >>> This would still install the br cli. > > > >>> > > > >>> The current dist archive is `apache-brooklyn-client-cli` for > example > > > >>> (stripping the version out), I don't see a dedicated RPM/Deb for > the > > > >> client > > > >>> but assume it would follow the same convention (* as an aside, is > the > > > >> -cli > > > >>> really necessary, do we expect to distribute other clients?) > > > >>> > > > >>> Any suggestions/objections on the above alternative? > > > >>> > > > >>> /John > > > >>> > > > >>> ps. What is the status of getting linux packages into Debian/Fedora > > > repos > > > >>> etc? What package naming will be used. > > > >>> > > > >> -- > > > >> > > > >> Thomas Bouron • Software Engineer @ Cloudsoft Corporation • > > > >> http://www.cloudsoftcorp.com/ > > > >> Github: https://github.com/tbouron > > > >> Twitter: https://twitter.com/eltibouron > > > >> > > > > > > > > >
