Hi,
Do you need any help to push the release forward?
Cheers,Roberto
On Wednesday, September 12, 2018, 7:59:20 AM GMT+1, Mark Struberg
<[email protected]> wrote:
right, same approach as I did.
LieGrue,
strub
> Am 10.09.2018 um 18:32 schrieb Romain Manni-Bucau <[email protected]>:
>
> For the ones I did, I just wrote it with "my words". This is not part of
> the signature so technically you can write a summary of your holidays
> (don't please ;)).
> If you have time let's enhance it, if not we can do a .0.1 for it, no issue
> and happy to lead this next release if needed.
>
> Romain Manni-Bucau
> @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog
> <https://rmannibucau.metawerx.net/> | Old Blog
> <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github <https://github.com/rmannibucau> |
> LinkedIn <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau> | Book
> <https://www.packtpub.com/application-development/java-ee-8-high-performance>
>
>
> Le lun. 10 sept. 2018 à 14:45, Matt Benson <[email protected]> a écrit :
>
>> The Geronimo versions of the v1.x specs never had any Javadoc to speak of.
>> This seems to be a problematic area anyway: how to document an API without
>> infringing the copyright of the reference API.
>>
>> Matt
>>
>> On Mon, Sep 10, 2018, 2:05 AM Mark Struberg <[email protected]>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> wohuuu, trying to make up a bit time today or tomorrow to push the
>>> geronimo-validation_2.0_spec release.
>>>
>>> If you want to add some JavaDocs before that then plz ping me and I wait
>> a
>>> bit.
>>> Need to run the compat checks anyway before we can ship it.
>>>
>>> LieGrue,
>>> strub
>>>
>>>> Am 28.08.2018 um 15:57 schrieb Matt Benson <[email protected]>:
>>>>
>>>> Good catch, Mark! Thanks!
>>>>
>>>> Matt
>>>>
>>>> On Tue, Aug 28, 2018 at 6:53 AM Mark Struberg
>> <[email protected]
>>>>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> We also need to release geronimo-validation-2.0. Will trigger this
>> over
>>> at
>>>>> Geronimo.
>>>>>
>>>>> LieGrue,
>>>>> strub
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>> Am 27.08.2018 um 20:32 schrieb Roberto Cortez
>>>>> <[email protected]>:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Great. Let me know if I can help.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On 27 Aug 2018, at 16:10, Matt Benson <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Sounds like the basic plan, yes.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Matt
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Mon, Aug 27, 2018 at 4:55 AM Roberto Cortez
>>>>> <[email protected]>
>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Great! Thanks.
>>>>>>>> So, do you think we can push for a Weaver release, so we can then
>>> push
>>>>> the
>>>>>>>> BVal release? We are trying to push for a TomEE 8 release, so we
>> need
>>>>> both
>>>>>>>> :)
>>>>>>>> Cheers,Roberto
>>>>>>>> On Friday, August 24, 2018, 10:20:17 PM GMT+1, Matt Benson <
>>>>>>>> [email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Thanks, merged!
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On Fri, Aug 24, 2018, 12:45 PM Roberto Cortez
>>>>> <[email protected]
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> I had a look and I think the issue is related with this:
>>>>>>>>> https://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/msg63326.html
>> <
>>>>>>>>> https://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/msg63326.html
>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> I think this should do the trick:
>>>>>>>>> https://github.com/apache/commons-weaver/pull/1 <
>>>>>>>>> https://github.com/apache/commons-weaver/pull/1>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Not sure if the report should be visible in the aggregator
>> project.
>>> I
>>>>>>>>> think not. At least I was able to see the report in the processor
>>>>>>>> project.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Hope it helps!
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Cheers,
>>>>>>>>> Roberto
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> I'm still trying to find time to finish the 1.4 release of
>> Commons
>>>>>>>>> Weaver.
>>>>>>>>>> I thought it was ready, but since traffic on the Commons ML
>> alerted
>>>>> me
>>>>>>>>> that
>>>>>>>>>> I should double check that the japicmp report is actually running
>>>>> with
>>>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>>>>> site goal. I might be able to take another look this Friday.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Matt
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> On Wed, Aug 22, 2018, 2:54 AM Thomas Andraschko <
>>>>>>>>>> [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]
>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> +1
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> 2018-08-22 9:52 GMT+02:00 Romain Manni-Bucau <
>>> [email protected]
>>>>>>>>> <mailto:[email protected]>>:
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> +1
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Romain Manni-Bucau
>>>>>>>>>>>> @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau <
>>>>>>>>> https://twitter.com/rmannibucau>> | Blog
>>>>>>>>>>>> <https://rmannibucau.metawerx.net/ <
>>>>>>>>> https://rmannibucau.metawerx.net/>> | Old Blog
>>>>>>>>>>>> <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com <
>>>>>>>> http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/>>
>>>>>>>>> | Github <https://github.com/ <https://github.com/>
>>>>>>>>>>>> rmannibucau> |
>>>>>>>>>>>> LinkedIn <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau <
>>>>>>>>> https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau>> | Book
>>>>>>>>>>>> <https://www.packtpub.com/application-development/java- <
>>>>>>>>> https://www.packtpub.com/application-development/java->
>>>>>>>>>>>> ee-8-high-performance>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Le mer. 22 août 2018 à 09:46, Mark Struberg
>>>>>>>>> <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> a
>>>>>>>>>>>> écrit :
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> hi folks!
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Do we want to go for a BVal-2.0.0 release?
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Seems we pass the TCK, so we should really kick it off I'd
>> say.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Wdyt?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> LieGrue,
>>>>>>>>>>>>> strub
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
