OK, so 2384 and 2392 are the critical path. Zoltan, when do you think you can finish 2392?
Volodymr, when do you think you can finish 2384? When we have these answers we can set a target date for the RC. Julian > On Jul 2, 2018, at 11:13 AM, Volodymyr Vysotskyi <[email protected]> wrote: > > Hi, > > Here is the list of the Jiras, which in my opinions should be fixed before > the release: > - https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-2384 Performance issue > - https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-2392 Regression > appeared after 1.16 (not sure about blocker status for this Jira) > - https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-2379 CVSS - I will merge PR > soon > > Nice to have fixes (most of them from the previous list): > - https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-194 Arrays in MongoDB - > AFAIK, Igor Kryvenko is working on the moving calcite-test-dataset to > docker, so after that, we can merge it. > - https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-2259 Java8 syntax > - https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-2280 Babel (blocked by 2259) > - https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-2339 JDBC adapter timestamp > arithmetic > > Depending on the time, required to fix CALCITE-2384 > <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-2384> and CALCITE-2392 > <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-2392>, we can set a target > date for the first RC, but I don't know the complexity of these issues and > current status for CALCITE-2384 > <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-2384>. > > Kind regards, > Volodymyr Vysotskyi > > > пн, 2 лип. 2018 о 20:42 Julian Hyde <[email protected]> пише: > >>> On Jun 29, 2018, at 7:29 PM, Francis Chuang <[email protected] >> <mailto:[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>> Can someone please confirm that the following PRs can be closed? >>> https://github.com/apache/calcite/pull/180 < >> https://github.com/apache/calcite/pull/180> >>> https://github.com/apache/calcite/pull/17 < >> https://github.com/apache/calcite/pull/17> >>> https://github.com/apache/calcite/pull/422 < >> https://github.com/apache/calcite/pull/422> >> >> I reviewed those PRs. They can be closed. I added comments asking the >> original contributors to close the PRs. This is always the preferred option. >> >> Are we agreed that adding ‘Close #NNN’ to another commit - while not >> perfect - is the least bad option for closing abandoned PRs? If so I’ll do >> that for these PRs in about 24 hours. >> >> Volodymyr, >> >> Do we have a list of what’s left for 1.17? I think we can set a target >> date for the first RC. >> >> Julian >> >>
