I think I can finish CALCITE-2392 on Wed or Thursday. Kind regards, Volodymyr Vysotskyi
пн, 2 лип. 2018 о 21:22 Julian Hyde <[email protected]> пише: > OK, so 2384 and 2392 are the critical path. > > Zoltan, when do you think you can finish 2392? > > Volodymr, when do you think you can finish 2384? > > When we have these answers we can set a target date for the RC. > > Julian > > > > On Jul 2, 2018, at 11:13 AM, Volodymyr Vysotskyi <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > > Hi, > > > > Here is the list of the Jiras, which in my opinions should be fixed > before > > the release: > > - https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-2384 Performance issue > > - https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-2392 Regression > > appeared after 1.16 (not sure about blocker status for this Jira) > > - https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-2379 CVSS - I will > merge PR > > soon > > > > Nice to have fixes (most of them from the previous list): > > - https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-194 Arrays in MongoDB - > > AFAIK, Igor Kryvenko is working on the moving calcite-test-dataset to > > docker, so after that, we can merge it. > > - https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-2259 Java8 syntax > > - https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-2280 Babel (blocked by > 2259) > > - https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-2339 JDBC adapter > timestamp > > arithmetic > > > > Depending on the time, required to fix CALCITE-2384 > > <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-2384> and CALCITE-2392 > > <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-2392>, we can set a > target > > date for the first RC, but I don't know the complexity of these issues > and > > current status for CALCITE-2384 > > <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-2384>. > > > > Kind regards, > > Volodymyr Vysotskyi > > > > > > пн, 2 лип. 2018 о 20:42 Julian Hyde <[email protected]> пише: > > > >>> On Jun 29, 2018, at 7:29 PM, Francis Chuang <[email protected] > >> <mailto:[email protected]> wrote: > >>> > >>> Can someone please confirm that the following PRs can be closed? > >>> https://github.com/apache/calcite/pull/180 < > >> https://github.com/apache/calcite/pull/180> > >>> https://github.com/apache/calcite/pull/17 < > >> https://github.com/apache/calcite/pull/17> > >>> https://github.com/apache/calcite/pull/422 < > >> https://github.com/apache/calcite/pull/422> > >> > >> I reviewed those PRs. They can be closed. I added comments asking the > >> original contributors to close the PRs. This is always the preferred > option. > >> > >> Are we agreed that adding ‘Close #NNN’ to another commit - while not > >> perfect - is the least bad option for closing abandoned PRs? If so I’ll > do > >> that for these PRs in about 24 hours. > >> > >> Volodymyr, > >> > >> Do we have a list of what’s left for 1.17? I think we can set a target > >> date for the first RC. > >> > >> Julian > >> > >> > >
