I have created PR-753 <https://github.com/apache/calcite/pull/753> for
CALCITE-2331. Please note it fixes only ES adapter (mongo is also affected).

On Thu, Jun 28, 2018 at 1:54 PM Michael Mior <mm...@apache.org> wrote:

> I'll add CALCITE-2331 as at least a nice-to-have. I believe Andrei is
> working on a PR and this would be a good bug to have fixed.
>
> * https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-2331 evaluation of
> predicate (A or B) and C is failing for some adapters
>
> --
> Michael Mior
> mm...@apache.org
>
>
>
> Le jeu. 28 juin 2018 à 13:34, Julian Hyde <jh...@apache.org> a écrit :
>
> > To answer Michael's question: I don't think we should delay the
> > report, nor should we hurry the release. It's fair to say that 1.17 is
> > in its final stages. There was a lot of activity on avatica-1.12 from
> > a lot of individuals, and the community is in great shape.
> >
> > Here are the cases listed by Volodymyr, converted into links:
> >
> > Must:
> > * https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-2379 CVSS - ?
> > * https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-2384 Performance issue
> > in getPulledUpPredicates - Zoltan
> > * https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-2365 Upgrade Avatica -
> > Julian
> > * https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-2303 EXTRACT - Julian
> >
> > Nice:
> > * https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-194 Arrays in MongoDB
> > - Volodymyr
> > * https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-2259 Java8 syntax -
> Kevin
> > * https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-2280 Babel - Julian
> > (blocked by 2259)
> > * https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-2339 JDBC adapter
> > timestamps - Julian to review
> >
> > Julian
> >
> >
> > On Thu, Jun 28, 2018 at 10:15 AM, Volodymyr Vysotskyi
> > <volody...@apache.org> wrote:
> > > Hi Michael,
> > >
> > > There are several Jiras, which I think are blockers for the
> > > release: CALCITE-2379, CALCITE-2384 and CALCITE-2365 + CALCITE-2303.
> > > Also, there is a list of the Jiras, which would be good to include to
> > > 1.17: CALCITE-194, CALCITE-2259, CALCITE-2280, CALCITE-2339.
> > >
> > > So I think we need at least couple of weeks to resolve these issues and
> > > release 1.17.
> > >
> > > Also, please let me know if there are other issues-blockers for the
> > > release, or if some of these issues may be omitted.
> > >
> > > Kind regards,
> > > Volodymyr Vysotskyi
> > >
> > >
> > > чт, 28 черв. 2018 о 20:13 Enrico Olivelli <eolive...@gmail.com> пише:
> > >
> > >> It also would be great to have at least a BETA version of Babel parser
> > >>
> > >> Enrico
> > >>
> > >> Il gio 28 giu 2018, 18:48 Michael Mior <mm...@apache.org> ha scritto:
> > >>
> > >> > Just wanted to check in with how we're doing with progress towards a
> > >> > release. It's not a rush at all, but I'm preparing the board report
> > for
> > >> > July and wondering if I should wait to include the 1.17.0 release.
> It
> > >> > sounds like there are a few other things that still need to be
> wrapped
> > >> up,
> > >> > so I'm fine if we don't release for another couple weeks.
> > >> >
> > >> > Thanks again Volodymyr for taking this on!
> > >> >
> > >> > --
> > >> > Michael Mior
> > >> > mm...@apache.org
> > >> >
> > >> >
> > >> >
> > >> > Le mer. 30 mai 2018 à 07:44, Volodymyr Vysotskyi <
> > volody...@apache.org>
> > >> a
> > >> > écrit :
> > >> >
> > >> > > Calcite 1.16.0 was released on March 19 (more than two months
> ago).
> > >> > > We have solved over 48 issues[1] since then, therefore we should
> > start
> > >> > > discussing about releasing Calcite 1.17.0.
> > >> > >
> > >> > > I have created [2] to track the release.
> > >> > >
> > >> > > We will start a release process after the Avatica 1.12 is
> released.
> > >> > >
> > >> > > I went through the list of opened PRs during the last month, and
> > here
> > >> is
> > >> > > the list of Jiras which possibly be merged before the release:
> > >> > >
> > >> > > CALCITE-2303: Support DECADE time unit in EXTRACT function -
> changes
> > >> are
> > >> > > done, depends on the Avatica release
> > >> > > CALCITE-2329: Enhance SubQueryRemoveRule to rewrite IN operator
> with
> > >> the
> > >> > > constant from the left side more optimally - I will make required
> > >> changes
> > >> > > at the beginning of next week
> > >> > >
> > >> > > * CALCITE-2321: Support ragged fixed length value union be
> variable
> > -
> > >> > > In review (Julian)*
> > >> > >
> > >> > > * CALCITE-2291: Add rule to push Project past Correlate - I will
> > pick
> > >> up
> > >> > > this next week*
> > >> > >
> > >> > > List of other pull requests which require review or additional
> > rework:
> > >> > >
> > >> > > CALCITE-2327: In 3 valued logic mode (b and not b) may not be
> > >> simplified
> > >> > to
> > >> > > false
> > >> > > CALCITE-2302 / CALCITE-2325: Implicit type cast support - Julian
> > added
> > >> a
> > >> > > comment into the Jira
> > >> > > CALCITE-2331: evaluation of predicate (A or B) and C is failing
> for
> > >> some
> > >> > > adapters - created PR only with a test for this Jira
> > >> > > CALCITE-2209: Support loading JSON model file through URL - Shuyi
> > Chen
> > >> > > added a comment into the Jira
> > >> > > CALCITE-2324: Extract seconds, minutes from date works not correct
> > in
> > >> > some
> > >> > > cases
> > >> > > CALCITE-2319: Druid Expressions - Output Type of Boolean
> expressions
> > >> > should
> > >> > > be set to FLOAT.
> > >> > > CALCITE-500: Ensure EnumerableJoin hashes the smallest input - PR
> is
> > >> > > created
> > >> > > CALCITE-2301: Remove the 10-second-timeout restriction in
> > >> > > ResultSetEnumerable - needs additional rework.
> > >> > >
> > >> > > Please let me know, if there are any Jiras should be included into
> > this
> > >> > > release.
> > >> > >
> > >> > > [1]
> > >> > >
> > >> > >
> > >> >
> > >>
> >
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?jql=project%20%3D%20CALCITE%20AND%20status%20%3D%20Resolved%20AND%20resolution%20%3D%20Fixed%20AND%20fixVersion%20%3D%201.17.0
> > >> > > [2] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-2337
> > >> > >
> > >> > > Kind regards,
> > >> > > Volodymyr Vysotskyi
> > >> > >
> > >> >
> > >> --
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> -- Enrico Olivelli
> > >>
> >
>

Reply via email to