Hi Volodymyr, I hope to be done with https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-2404 before the end of next week. Personally, I don't mind if it does not make it to this release since for my use-case I can patch the code directly.
Best, Stamatis 2018-07-11 17:13 GMT+02:00 Julian Hyde <[email protected]>: > I think this release train has waited long enough. We should wait for > issues that people are fixing themselves, within the next 24 hours. And > review PRs that have already been submitted. > > We release regularly, so there will be another train in a couple of months. > > Julian > > > On Jul 11, 2018, at 07:34, Andrei Sereda <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > Hello, > > > > If people on this list don't mind, I would like to finish two more issues > > for ES adapter: > > 1) CALCITE-2408 enable aggregate functions in ES adapter > > 2) CALCITE-2411 expose a table for each ES index (by default) - this was > > discussed <https://markmail.org/thread/jryg6ptmu26krezp> on dev list > last > > week. > > > > They should be done next week. > > Regards, > > Andrei. > > > >> On Wed, Jul 11, 2018 at 7:00 AM Michael Mior <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> > >> It would be good if someone else could also have a look at the PR > >> below for CALCITE-2331 as it's basically ready to merge pending a > >> decision on a behaviour change. > >> > >> https://github.com/apache/calcite/pull/755 > >> > >> -- > >> Michael Mior > >> [email protected] > >> > >> Le mer. 11 juil. 2018 à 06:30, Stamatis Zampetakis <[email protected]> > a > >> écrit : > >>> > >>> Hello, > >>> > >>> I would like to bring your attention towards a new issue namely > >>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-2404 concerning access > on > >>> structured types. > >>> Basically, any query involving fields of Record type cannot be executed > >> by > >>> the runtime (in Enumerable/Bindable convention). > >>> > >>> At least for me, it appears as an important issue that it would be good > >> if > >>> it can be resolved before the next release. Now, I leave the decision > up > >> to > >>> you. > >>> > >>> Best, > >>> Stamatis > >>> > >>> 2018-07-11 11:39 GMT+02:00 Volodymyr Vysotskyi <[email protected]>: > >>> > >>>> Both blocking the release issues were fixed > >>>> and almost all "nice to have" fixes from the list were merged > >>>> into the master, thanks a lot for this to everyone! > >>>> > >>>> Regarding PRs which may be included into the release, > >>>> looks like work for CALCITE-2366 > >>>> <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-2366> is finished. > >>>> > >>>> Are there other PRs which may be merged before starting > >>>> the release process or new blocking issues? > >>>> > >>>> Kind regards, > >>>> Volodymyr Vysotskyi > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> пт, 6 лип. 2018 о 17:58 Andrei Sereda <[email protected]> пише: > >>>> > >>>>> I have created PR-753 <https://github.com/apache/calcite/pull/753> > >> for > >>>>> CALCITE-2331. Please note it fixes only ES adapter (mongo is also > >>>>> affected). > >>>>> > >>>>> On Thu, Jun 28, 2018 at 1:54 PM Michael Mior <[email protected]> > >> wrote: > >>>>> > >>>>>> I'll add CALCITE-2331 as at least a nice-to-have. I believe Andrei > >> is > >>>>>> working on a PR and this would be a good bug to have fixed. > >>>>>> > >>>>>> * https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-2331 evaluation of > >>>>>> predicate (A or B) and C is failing for some adapters > >>>>>> > >>>>>> -- > >>>>>> Michael Mior > >>>>>> [email protected] > >>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>>> Le jeu. 28 juin 2018 à 13:34, Julian Hyde <[email protected]> a > >> écrit : > >>>>>> > >>>>>>> To answer Michael's question: I don't think we should delay the > >>>>>>> report, nor should we hurry the release. It's fair to say that > >> 1.17 > >>>> is > >>>>>>> in its final stages. There was a lot of activity on avatica-1.12 > >> from > >>>>>>> a lot of individuals, and the community is in great shape. > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> Here are the cases listed by Volodymyr, converted into links: > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> Must: > >>>>>>> * https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-2379 CVSS - ? > >>>>>>> * https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-2384 Performance > >>>> issue > >>>>>>> in getPulledUpPredicates - Zoltan > >>>>>>> * https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-2365 Upgrade > >>>> Avatica - > >>>>>>> Julian > >>>>>>> * https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-2303 EXTRACT - > >>>> Julian > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> Nice: > >>>>>>> * https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-194 Arrays in > >>>> MongoDB > >>>>>>> - Volodymyr > >>>>>>> * https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-2259 Java8 > >> syntax - > >>>>>> Kevin > >>>>>>> * https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-2280 Babel - > >> Julian > >>>>>>> (blocked by 2259) > >>>>>>> * https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-2339 JDBC > >> adapter > >>>>>>> timestamps - Julian to review > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> Julian > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> On Thu, Jun 28, 2018 at 10:15 AM, Volodymyr Vysotskyi > >>>>>>> <[email protected]> wrote: > >>>>>>>> Hi Michael, > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> There are several Jiras, which I think are blockers for the > >>>>>>>> release: CALCITE-2379, CALCITE-2384 and CALCITE-2365 + > >>>> CALCITE-2303. > >>>>>>>> Also, there is a list of the Jiras, which would be good to > >> include > >>>> to > >>>>>>>> 1.17: CALCITE-194, CALCITE-2259, CALCITE-2280, CALCITE-2339. > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> So I think we need at least couple of weeks to resolve these > >> issues > >>>>> and > >>>>>>>> release 1.17. > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> Also, please let me know if there are other issues-blockers > >> for the > >>>>>>>> release, or if some of these issues may be omitted. > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> Kind regards, > >>>>>>>> Volodymyr Vysotskyi > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> чт, 28 черв. 2018 о 20:13 Enrico Olivelli <[email protected] > >>> > >>>>> пише: > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> It also would be great to have at least a BETA version of > >> Babel > >>>>> parser > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> Enrico > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> Il gio 28 giu 2018, 18:48 Michael Mior <[email protected]> ha > >>>>> scritto: > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>> Just wanted to check in with how we're doing with progress > >>>>> towards a > >>>>>>>>>> release. It's not a rush at all, but I'm preparing the board > >>>>> report > >>>>>>> for > >>>>>>>>>> July and wondering if I should wait to include the 1.17.0 > >>>> release. > >>>>>> It > >>>>>>>>>> sounds like there are a few other things that still need to > >> be > >>>>>> wrapped > >>>>>>>>> up, > >>>>>>>>>> so I'm fine if we don't release for another couple weeks. > >>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>> Thanks again Volodymyr for taking this on! > >>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>> -- > >>>>>>>>>> Michael Mior > >>>>>>>>>> [email protected] > >>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>> Le mer. 30 mai 2018 à 07:44, Volodymyr Vysotskyi < > >>>>>>> [email protected]> > >>>>>>>>> a > >>>>>>>>>> écrit : > >>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>> Calcite 1.16.0 was released on March 19 (more than two > >> months > >>>>>> ago). > >>>>>>>>>>> We have solved over 48 issues[1] since then, therefore we > >>>> should > >>>>>>> start > >>>>>>>>>>> discussing about releasing Calcite 1.17.0. > >>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>> I have created [2] to track the release. > >>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>> We will start a release process after the Avatica 1.12 is > >>>>>> released. > >>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>> I went through the list of opened PRs during the last > >> month, > >>>> and > >>>>>>> here > >>>>>>>>> is > >>>>>>>>>>> the list of Jiras which possibly be merged before the > >> release: > >>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>> CALCITE-2303: Support DECADE time unit in EXTRACT > >> function - > >>>>>> changes > >>>>>>>>> are > >>>>>>>>>>> done, depends on the Avatica release > >>>>>>>>>>> CALCITE-2329: Enhance SubQueryRemoveRule to rewrite IN > >>>> operator > >>>>>> with > >>>>>>>>> the > >>>>>>>>>>> constant from the left side more optimally - I will make > >>>>> required > >>>>>>>>> changes > >>>>>>>>>>> at the beginning of next week > >>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>> * CALCITE-2321: Support ragged fixed length value union be > >>>>>> variable > >>>>>>> - > >>>>>>>>>>> In review (Julian)* > >>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>> * CALCITE-2291: Add rule to push Project past Correlate - > >> I > >>>> will > >>>>>>> pick > >>>>>>>>> up > >>>>>>>>>>> this next week* > >>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>> List of other pull requests which require review or > >> additional > >>>>>>> rework: > >>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>> CALCITE-2327: In 3 valued logic mode (b and not b) may > >> not be > >>>>>>>>> simplified > >>>>>>>>>> to > >>>>>>>>>>> false > >>>>>>>>>>> CALCITE-2302 / CALCITE-2325: Implicit type cast support - > >>>> Julian > >>>>>>> added > >>>>>>>>> a > >>>>>>>>>>> comment into the Jira > >>>>>>>>>>> CALCITE-2331: evaluation of predicate (A or B) and C is > >>>> failing > >>>>>> for > >>>>>>>>> some > >>>>>>>>>>> adapters - created PR only with a test for this Jira > >>>>>>>>>>> CALCITE-2209: Support loading JSON model file through URL > >> - > >>>>> Shuyi > >>>>>>> Chen > >>>>>>>>>>> added a comment into the Jira > >>>>>>>>>>> CALCITE-2324: Extract seconds, minutes from date works not > >>>>> correct > >>>>>>> in > >>>>>>>>>> some > >>>>>>>>>>> cases > >>>>>>>>>>> CALCITE-2319: Druid Expressions - Output Type of Boolean > >>>>>> expressions > >>>>>>>>>> should > >>>>>>>>>>> be set to FLOAT. > >>>>>>>>>>> CALCITE-500: Ensure EnumerableJoin hashes the smallest > >> input - > >>>>> PR > >>>>>> is > >>>>>>>>>>> created > >>>>>>>>>>> CALCITE-2301: Remove the 10-second-timeout restriction in > >>>>>>>>>>> ResultSetEnumerable - needs additional rework. > >>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>> Please let me know, if there are any Jiras should be > >> included > >>>>> into > >>>>>>> this > >>>>>>>>>>> release. > >>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>> [1] > >>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?jql=project%20% > >>>> 3D%20CALCITE%20AND%20status%20%3D%20Resolved%20AND% > >>>> 20resolution%20%3D%20Fixed%20AND%20fixVersion%20%3D%201.17.0 > >>>>>>>>>>> [2] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-2337 > >>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>> Kind regards, > >>>>>>>>>>> Volodymyr Vysotskyi > >>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> -- > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> -- Enrico Olivelli > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>> > >>>> > >> >
