> PS. I wonder what everybody think of > https://github.com/apache/calcite/pull/2182 (enable error-prone > verifications) I’m in favor it, but since it’s a large change (and therefore potential for merge conflicts), timing will be important. Early in 1.27 is probably the best timing. Julian
- Re: [DISCUSS] Towards Calcite 1.26.0 Ruben Q L
- Re: [DISCUSS] Towards Calcite 1.26.0 Rui Wang
- Re: [DISCUSS] Towards Calcite 1.26.0 Chunwei Lei
- Re: [DISCUSS] Towards Calcite 1.26.0 Ruben Q L
- Re: [DISCUSS] Towards Calcite 1.26.0 Julian Hyde
- Re: [DISCUSS] Towards Calcite 1.26.0 Ruben Q L
- Re: [DISCUSS] Towards Calcite 1.26.0 Julian Hyde
- Re: [DISCUSS] Towards Calcite 1.26.0 Danny Chan
- Re: [DISCUSS] Towards Calcite 1.26.0 Ruben Q L
- Re: [DISCUSS] Towards Calcite 1.26.0 Vladimir Sitnikov
- Re: [DISCUSS] Towards Calcite 1.26.0 Julian Hyde
- Re: [DISCUSS] Towards Calcite 1.26.0 Ruben Q L
- Re: [DISCUSS] Towards Calcite 1.26.0 Ruben Q L
- Re: [DISCUSS] Towards Calcite 1.26.0 Stamatis Zampetakis
- Re: [DISCUSS] Towards Calcite 1.26.0 Ruben Q L
- Re: [DISCUSS] Towards Calcite 1.26.0 Vladimir Sitnikov
- Re: [DISCUSS] Towards Calcite 1.26.0 Vladimir Sitnikov
- Re: [DISCUSS] Towards Calcite 1.26.0 Ruben Q L
- Re: [DISCUSS] Towards Calcite 1.26.0 Ruben Q L
- Re: [DISCUSS] Towards Calcite 1.26.0 Danny Chan
- Re: [DISCUSS] Towards Calcite 1.26.0 Ruben Q L