After I switched from Mac to Ubuntu, the dependency check starts to work :)
-Rui On Mon, Dec 20, 2021 at 11:47 AM Rui Wang <[email protected]> wrote: > I am Generate a report of vulnerabilities that occur among dependencies > when running `./gradlew :dependencyCheckUpdate`, I consistently hit > > Unable to download meta file: > https://nvd.nist.gov/feeds/json/cve/1.1/xxx.meta and seems the root cause > is "unable to connect". > > > > Has anyone seen it in the past? > > > -Rui > > > > On Sun, Dec 19, 2021 at 6:26 PM Rui Wang <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Hi community, >> >> Now the main branch is locked at [1]. I will work toward RC0. >> >> >> [1] >> https://github.com/apache/calcite/commit/7a7b37fc1f4bd2121643539b0fd8e9c4f0f8ed09 >> >> >> -Rui >> >> On Sun, Dec 19, 2021 at 1:19 AM Alessandro Solimando < >> [email protected]> wrote: >> >>> Hello everyone, >>> I have merged https://github.com/apache/calcite/pull/2628 ( >>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4917) into master. >>> >>> Best regards, >>> Alessandro >>> >>> On Sat, 18 Dec 2021 at 21:21, Rui Wang <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>> > Thanks for more information Julian. Then there should not have known >>> > blockers at this moment. >>> > >>> > Hi Alessandro, >>> > >>> > I will wait for another 24 hours before blocking the main branch. It >>> should >>> > be enough time so please feel free to merge PR once there is no >>> objection. >>> > >>> > -Rui >>> > >>> > On Sat, Dec 18, 2021 at 11:45 AM Alessandro Solimando < >>> > [email protected]> wrote: >>> > >>> > > Hi everyone, >>> > > I'd like to merge https://github.com/apache/calcite/pull/2628 ( >>> > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4917) which is ready >>> if >>> > > there >>> > > are no objections. >>> > > >>> > > Since it's just adding an extra test it's not urgent at all, so if it >>> > > causes any troubles it can be postponed after the release. >>> > > >>> > > Best regards, >>> > > Alessandro >>> > > >>> > > On Sat, 18 Dec 2021 at 19:19, Julian Hyde <[email protected]> >>> > wrote: >>> > > >>> > > > Ah, I see Stamatis has Log4j covered: >>> > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4950 < >>> > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4950>. >>> > > > >>> > > > > On Dec 18, 2021, at 10:17 AM, Julian Hyde < >>> [email protected]> >>> > > > wrote: >>> > > > > >>> > > > > I think we should skip CALCITE-4907. There’s still discussion in >>> its >>> > > PR, >>> > > > https://github.com/apache/calcite/pull/2620 < >>> > > > https://github.com/apache/calcite/pull/2620>. I promise we’ll get >>> it >>> > in >>> > > > soon after the release. >>> > > > > >>> > > > > In other news, there’s a new Log4j version, 2.17, addressing a >>> new >>> > > > CVE[1]. Let’s get that in. >>> > > > > >>> > > > > Julian >>> > > > > >>> > > > > [1] >>> > > > >>> > > >>> > >>> https://thehackernews.com/2021/12/apache-issues-3rd-patch-to-fix-new-high.html >>> > > > < >>> > > > >>> > > >>> > >>> https://thehackernews.com/2021/12/apache-issues-3rd-patch-to-fix-new-high.html >>> > > > > >>> > > > > >>> > > > >> On Dec 18, 2021, at 6:58 AM, Vladimir Ozerov < >>> [email protected] >>> > > > <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: >>> > > > >> >>> > > > >> Hi Xiong, >>> > > > >> >>> > > > >> Thank you very much. >>> > > > >> >>> > > > >> Vladimir. >>> > > > >> >>> > > > >> Сб, 18 дек. 2021 г. в 14:32, xiong duan <[email protected] >>> > <mailto: >>> > > > [email protected]>>: >>> > > > >> >>> > > > >>> Hi Vladimir, >>> > > > >>> >>> > > > >>> I have merged. >>> > > > >>> >>> > > > >>> Vladimir Ozerov <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected] >>> >> >>> > > > 于2021年12月18日周六 16:58写道： >>> > > > >>> >>> > > > >>>> Hi Xiong, >>> > > > >>>> >>> > > > >>>> I've just resolved the conflicts. >>> > > > >>>> >>> > > > >>>> Regards, >>> > > > >>>> Vladimir. >>> > > > >>>> >>> > > > >>>> сб, 18 дек. 2021 г. в 10:48, xiong duan <[email protected] >>> > > <mailto: >>> > > > [email protected]>>: >>> > > > >>>> >>> > > > >>>>> Hi, Vladimir. >>> > > > >>>>> >>> > > > >>>>> The PR[https://github.com/apache/calcite/pull/2464 < >>> > > > https://github.com/apache/calcite/pull/2464>] looks good. If you >>> > > > >>>>> have >>> > > > >>>>> free time Please resolve the conflicts. Then we can merge it. >>> > > > >>>>> >>> > > > >>>>> Vladimir Ozerov <[email protected] <mailto: >>> [email protected]>> >>> > > > 于2021年12月18日周六 15:20写道： >>> > > > >>>>> >>> > > > >>>>>> Hi, >>> > > > >>>>>> >>> > > > >>>>>> Could you please also merge >>> > > > >>>>>> https://github.com/apache/calcite/pull/2464 < >>> > > > https://github.com/apache/calcite/pull/2464> ? I guess it got >>> stuck >>> > > > >>>>>> somehow, >>> > > > >>>>>> as all the comments are addressed. This issue forced us to >>> > create >>> > > a >>> > > > >>>> copy >>> > > > >>>>> of >>> > > > >>>>>> the AggregateUnionTransposeRule in our project. >>> > > > >>>>>> >>> > > > >>>>>> Regards, >>> > > > >>>>>> Vladimir >>> > > > >>>>>> >>> > > > >>>>>> Сб, 18 дек. 2021 г. в 09:51, Rui Wang <[email protected] >>> > > > <mailto:[email protected]>>: >>> > > > >>>>>> >>> > > > >>>>>>> Thanks Julian! >>> > > > >>>>>>> >>> > > > >>>>>>> Now we will just decide whether to merge CALCITE-4907 or >>> not, >>> > > then >>> > > > >>> I >>> > > > >>>>> will >>> > > > >>>>>>> lock the main branch and start the release process. >>> > > > >>>>>>> >>> > > > >>>>>>> >>> > > > >>>>>>> -Rui >>> > > > >>>>>>> >>> > > > >>>>>>> On Fri, Dec 17, 2021 at 10:29 PM Julian Hyde < >>> > > > >>> [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> >>> > > > >>>>> >>> > > > >>>>>>> wrote: >>> > > > >>>>>>> >>> > > > >>>>>>>> Rui, I have merged CALCITE-4946. >>> > > > >>>>>>>> >>> > > > >>>>>>>>> On Dec 17, 2021, at 10:21 PM, Rui Wang < >>> [email protected] >>> > > >>> > > > >>>>> wrote: >>> > > > >>>>>>>>> >>> > > > >>>>>>>>> Thanks Zhe. >>> > > > >>>>>>>>> >>> > > > >>>>>>>>> Hi Francesco, >>> > > > >>>>>>>>> >>> > > > >>>>>>>>> I left a comment in your PR. Can you take a look? >>> > > > >>>>>>>>> >>> > > > >>>>>>>>> -Rui >>> > > > >>>>>>>>> >>> > > > >>>>>>>>> On Fri, Dec 17, 2021 at 3:32 PM Zhe Hu <[email protected] >>> > >>> > > > >>> wrote: >>> > > > >>>>>>>>> >>> > > > >>>>>>>>>> Hi, Rui. >>> > > > >>>>>>>>>> CALCITE-4860 will be fixed in next release, you can >>> pass it >>> > > > >>>>>> currently. >>> > > > >>>>>>>>>> Thanks for your work! >>> > > > >>>>>>>>>> >>> > > > >>>>>>>>>> >>> > > > >>>>>>>>>> Best, >>> > > > >>>>>>>>>> ZheHu >>> > > > >>>>>>>>>> >>> > > > >>>>>>>>>> >>> > > > >>>>>>>>>> >>> > > > >>>>>>>>>> >>> > > > >>>>>>>>>> >>> > > > >>>>>>>>>> >>> > > > >>>>>>>>>> On 12/18/2021 06:08，Francesco Gini< >>> [email protected] >>> > > >>> > > > >>>>> wrote： >>> > > > >>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4907 is >>> in >>> > > > >>>> review. >>> > > > >>>>> I >>> > > > >>>>>>>> believe >>> > > > >>>>>>>>>> I have addressed all the comments. Let me know if I >>> missed >>> > > > >>>>> anything. >>> > > > >>>>>>>>>> >>> > > > >>>>>>>>>> On Fri, 17 Dec 2021 at 22:42, Jacques Nadeau < >>> > > > >>>> [email protected]> >>> > > > >>>>>>>> wrote: >>> > > > >>>>>>>>>> >>> > > > >>>>>>>>>> I've merged CALCITE-4948 to mitigate the concerns around >>> > > > >>>>>> CALCITE-4898 >>> > > > >>>>>>>> and >>> > > > >>>>>>>>>> maven repositories and category x licenses. >>> > > > >>>>>>>>>> >>> > > > >>>>>>>>>> On Fri, Dec 17, 2021 at 1:02 PM Rui Wang < >>> > > > >>> [email protected]> >>> > > > >>>>>>> wrote: >>> > > > >>>>>>>>>> >>> > > > >>>>>>>>>> For the list of 1.29 fix Jira, several Jira have been >>> marked >>> > > > >>> as >>> > > > >>>>>>> resolved >>> > > > >>>>>>>>>> since this Monday. I will do another pass today but >>> probably >>> > > > >>> not >>> > > > >>>>> all >>> > > > >>>>>>>>>> those >>> > > > >>>>>>>>>> will make the 1.29.0 release. >>> > > > >>>>>>>>>> >>> > > > >>>>>>>>>> >>> > > > >>>>>>>>>> -Rui >>> > > > >>>>>>>>>> >>> > > > >>>>>>>>>> On Fri, Dec 17, 2021 at 11:57 AM Ruben Q L < >>> > [email protected] >>> > > > >>>> >>> > > > >>>>>> wrote: >>> > > > >>>>>>>>>> >>> > > > >>>>>>>>>> Hello, >>> > > > >>>>>>>>>> >>> > > > >>>>>>>>>> FYI https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4737 >>> has >>> > > > >>> been >>> > > > >>>>>>>>>> merged. >>> > > > >>>>>>>>>> >>> > > > >>>>>>>>>> Regards, >>> > > > >>>>>>>>>> Ruben >>> > > > >>>>>>>>>> >>> > > > >>>>>>>>>> >>> > > > >>>>>>>>>> On Fri, Dec 17, 2021 at 7:40 PM Julian Hyde < >>> > > > >>>>> [email protected] >>> > > > >>>>>>> >>> > > > >>>>>>>>>> wrote: >>> > > > >>>>>>>>>> >>> > > > >>>>>>>>>> Rui, >>> > > > >>>>>>>>>> >>> > > > >>>>>>>>>> Even though >>> > > > >>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4898 >>> > > > >>>> < >>> > > > >>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4898> is >>> > marked >>> > > > >>>>>> fixed, >>> > > > >>>>>>>>>> there’s some fallout regarding maven repositories and >>> > category >>> > > > >>>> X. >>> > > > >>>>>>>>>> That >>> > > > >>>>>>>>>> needs to be sorted out before RC0. See [1]. >>> > > > >>>>>>>>>> >>> > > > >>>>>>>>>> I’m working on getting >>> > > > >>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4946 >>> > > > >>>>>>>>>> <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4946> >>> done >>> > > > >>>> today. >>> > > > >>>>>>>>>> Please >>> > > > >>>>>>>>>> wait for that. >>> > > > >>>>>>>>>> >>> > > > >>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4885 < >>> > > > >>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4885> is >>> a >>> > big >>> > > > >>>>>>>>>> refactoring >>> > > > >>>>>>>>>> and, though I’d love to get it in before the release, it >>> > isn’t >>> > > > >>>>> going >>> > > > >>>>>>>>>> to >>> > > > >>>>>>>>>> happen. Don’t wait for it. >>> > > > >>>>>>>>>> >>> > > > >>>>>>>>>> I also see the following as open or in progress and >>> > > > >>> fix-in-1.29: >>> > > > >>>>>>>>>> * https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4872 < >>> > > > >>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4872> >>> (Will >>> > > > >>>> Noble) >>> > > > >>>>>>>>>> * https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4908 < >>> > > > >>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4908> >>> > (Woonsan >>> > > > >>>> Koo) >>> > > > >>>>>>>>>> * https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4704 < >>> > > > >>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4704> >>> > > > >>> (Stamatis) >>> > > > >>>>>>>>>> * https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4737 < >>> > > > >>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4737> >>> (Thomas >>> > > > >>>>> Rebele) >>> > > > >>>>>>>>>> * https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4860 < >>> > > > >>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4860> >>> (Zhe >>> > Hu / >>> > > > >>>>> Duan >>> > > > >>>>>>>>>> Xiong) >>> > > > >>>>>>>>>> * https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4907 < >>> > > > >>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4907> >>> > > > >>> (Francesco >>> > > > >>>>>> Gini) >>> > > > >>>>>>>>>> >>> > > > >>>>>>>>>> What’s the status on those? >>> > > > >>>>>>>>>> >>> > > > >>>>>>>>>> Julian >>> > > > >>>>>>>>>> >>> > > > >>>>>>>>>> [1] https://github.com/apache/calcite/pull/2622 < >>> > > > >>>>>>>>>> https://github.com/apache/calcite/pull/2622> >>> > > > >>>>>>>>>> >>> > > > >>>>>>>>>> PS It feels churlish to bring this up, but in >>> time-honored >>> > > > >>>>> tradition >>> > > > >>>>>>>>>> the >>> > > > >>>>>>>>>> email subject has been ‘[DISCUSS] Towards Calcite >>> x.y.z’. >>> > > > >>>>>>>>>> >>> > > > >>>>>>>>>> >>> > > > >>>>>>>>>> On Dec 14, 2021, at 10:37 AM, Rui Wang < >>> > [email protected]> >>> > > > >>>>>>>>>> wrote: >>> > > > >>>>>>>>>> >>> > > > >>>>>>>>>> Hi community, >>> > > > >>>>>>>>>> >>> > > > >>>>>>>>>> To prepare for Calcite 1.29.0 release, I will start to >>> check >>> > > > >>> the >>> > > > >>>>>>>>>> JIRA >>> > > > >>>>>>>>>> list >>> > > > >>>>>>>>>> [1] which marks its fix version as 1.29.0 (9 JIRA as of >>> now >>> > > > >>>>> remains >>> > > > >>>>>>>>>> open/in >>> > > > >>>>>>>>>> progress) and also the pending PRs which looks >>> promising to >>> > be >>> > > > >>>>>>>>>> merged. >>> > > > >>>>>>>>>> Please help resolve/review/merge JIRA/PRs if you want >>> some >>> > > > >>> fixes >>> > > > >>>>> to >>> > > > >>>>>>>>>> be >>> > > > >>>>>>>>>> released. >>> > > > >>>>>>>>>> >>> > > > >>>>>>>>>> >>> > > > >>>>>>>>>> My current goal is to start freezing the main branch of >>> > > > >>> Calcite >>> > > > >>>> by >>> > > > >>>>>>>>>> the >>> > > > >>>>>>>>>> end >>> > > > >>>>>>>>>> of this week. >>> > > > >>>>>>>>>> >>> > > > >>>>>>>>>> Please let me know if you have any questions. >>> > > > >>>>>>>>>> >>> > > > >>>>>>>>>> [1]: >>> > > > >>>>>>>>>> >>> > > > >>>>>>>>>> >>> > > > >>>>>>>>>> >>> > > > >>>>>>>>>> >>> > > > >>>>>>>>>> >>> > > > >>>>>>>>>> >>> > > > >>>>>>>> >>> > > > >>>>>>> >>> > > > >>>>>> >>> > > > >>>>> >>> > > > >>>> >>> > > > >>> >>> > > > >>> > > >>> > >>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4941?jql=project%20%3D%20CALCITE%20AND%20status%20in%20(Open%2C%20%22In%20Progress%22)%20AND%20fixVersion%20%3D%201.29.0 >>> > > > >>>>>>>>>> >>> > > > >>>>>>>>>> >>> > > > >>>>>>>>>> -Rui >>> > > > >>>>>>>>>> >>> > > > >>>>>>>>>> >>> > > > >>>>>>>>>> >>> > > > >>>>>>>>>> >>> > > > >>>>>>>>>> >>> > > > >>>>>>>>>> >>> > > > >>>>>>>>>> >>> > > > >>>>>>>>>> -- >>> > > > >>>>>>>>>> Francesco Gini >>> > > > >>>>>>>>>> >>> > > > >>>>>>>> >>> > > > >>>>>>>> >>> > > > >>>>>>> >>> > > > >>>>>> >>> > > > >>>>> >>> > > > >>>> >>> > > > >>> >>> > > > > >>> > > > >>> > > > >>> > > >>> > >>> >>
