Hi Xiong,

I've just resolved the conflicts.

Regards,
Vladimir.

сб, 18 дек. 2021 г. в 10:48, xiong duan <[email protected]>:

> Hi, Vladimir.
>
> The PR[https://github.com/apache/calcite/pull/2464] looks good. If you
> have
> free time Please resolve the conflicts. Then we can merge it.
>
> Vladimir Ozerov <[email protected]> 于2021年12月18日周六 15:20写道:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > Could you please also merge
> > https://github.com/apache/calcite/pull/2464 ? I guess it got stuck
> > somehow,
> > as all the comments are addressed. This issue forced us to create a copy
> of
> > the AggregateUnionTransposeRule in our project.
> >
> > Regards,
> > Vladimir
> >
> > Сб, 18 дек. 2021 г. в 09:51, Rui Wang <[email protected]>:
> >
> > > Thanks Julian!
> > >
> > > Now we will just decide whether to merge CALCITE-4907 or not, then I
> will
> > > lock the main branch and start the release process.
> > >
> > >
> > > -Rui
> > >
> > > On Fri, Dec 17, 2021 at 10:29 PM Julian Hyde <[email protected]>
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > > > Rui, I have merged CALCITE-4946.
> > > >
> > > > > On Dec 17, 2021, at 10:21 PM, Rui Wang <[email protected]>
> wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > Thanks Zhe.
> > > > >
> > > > > Hi Francesco,
> > > > >
> > > > > I left a comment in your PR. Can you take a look?
> > > > >
> > > > > -Rui
> > > > >
> > > > > On Fri, Dec 17, 2021 at 3:32 PM Zhe Hu <[email protected]> wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > >> Hi, Rui.
> > > > >> CALCITE-4860 will be fixed in next release, you can pass it
> > currently.
> > > > >> Thanks for your work!
> > > > >>
> > > > >>
> > > > >> Best,
> > > > >> ZheHu
> > > > >>
> > > > >>
> > > > >>
> > > > >>
> > > > >>
> > > > >>
> > > > >> On 12/18/2021 06:08,Francesco Gini<[email protected]>
> wrote:
> > > > >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4907 is in review.
> I
> > > > believe
> > > > >> I have addressed all the comments. Let me know if I missed
> anything.
> > > > >>
> > > > >> On Fri, 17 Dec 2021 at 22:42, Jacques Nadeau <[email protected]>
> > > > wrote:
> > > > >>
> > > > >> I've merged CALCITE-4948 to mitigate the concerns around
> > CALCITE-4898
> > > > and
> > > > >> maven repositories and category x licenses.
> > > > >>
> > > > >> On Fri, Dec 17, 2021 at 1:02 PM Rui Wang <[email protected]>
> > > wrote:
> > > > >>
> > > > >> For the list of 1.29 fix Jira, several Jira have been marked as
> > > resolved
> > > > >> since this Monday. I will do another pass today but probably not
> all
> > > > >> those
> > > > >> will make the 1.29.0 release.
> > > > >>
> > > > >>
> > > > >> -Rui
> > > > >>
> > > > >> On Fri, Dec 17, 2021 at 11:57 AM Ruben Q L <[email protected]>
> > wrote:
> > > > >>
> > > > >> Hello,
> > > > >>
> > > > >> FYI https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4737 has been
> > > > >> merged.
> > > > >>
> > > > >> Regards,
> > > > >> Ruben
> > > > >>
> > > > >>
> > > > >> On Fri, Dec 17, 2021 at 7:40 PM Julian Hyde <
> [email protected]
> > >
> > > > >> wrote:
> > > > >>
> > > > >> Rui,
> > > > >>
> > > > >> Even though https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4898 <
> > > > >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4898> is marked
> > fixed,
> > > > >> there’s some fallout regarding maven repositories and category X.
> > > > >> That
> > > > >> needs to be sorted out before RC0. See [1].
> > > > >>
> > > > >> I’m working on getting
> > > > >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4946
> > > > >> <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4946> done today.
> > > > >> Please
> > > > >> wait for that.
> > > > >>
> > > > >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4885 <
> > > > >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4885> is a big
> > > > >> refactoring
> > > > >> and, though I’d love to get it in before the release, it isn’t
> going
> > > > >> to
> > > > >> happen. Don’t wait for it.
> > > > >>
> > > > >> I also see the following as open or in progress and fix-in-1.29:
> > > > >> * https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4872 <
> > > > >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4872> (Will Noble)
> > > > >> * https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4908 <
> > > > >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4908> (Woonsan Koo)
> > > > >> * https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4704 <
> > > > >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4704> (Stamatis)
> > > > >> * https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4737 <
> > > > >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4737> (Thomas
> Rebele)
> > > > >> * https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4860 <
> > > > >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4860> (Zhe Hu /
> Duan
> > > > >> Xiong)
> > > > >> * https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4907 <
> > > > >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4907> (Francesco
> > Gini)
> > > > >>
> > > > >> What’s the status on those?
> > > > >>
> > > > >> Julian
> > > > >>
> > > > >> [1] https://github.com/apache/calcite/pull/2622 <
> > > > >> https://github.com/apache/calcite/pull/2622>
> > > > >>
> > > > >> PS It feels churlish to bring this up, but in time-honored
> tradition
> > > > >> the
> > > > >> email subject has been ‘[DISCUSS] Towards Calcite x.y.z’.
> > > > >>
> > > > >>
> > > > >> On Dec 14, 2021, at 10:37 AM, Rui Wang <[email protected]>
> > > > >> wrote:
> > > > >>
> > > > >> Hi community,
> > > > >>
> > > > >> To prepare for Calcite 1.29.0 release, I will start to check the
> > > > >> JIRA
> > > > >> list
> > > > >> [1] which marks its fix version as 1.29.0 (9 JIRA as of now
> remains
> > > > >> open/in
> > > > >> progress) and also the pending PRs which looks promising to be
> > > > >> merged.
> > > > >> Please help resolve/review/merge JIRA/PRs if you want some fixes
> to
> > > > >> be
> > > > >> released.
> > > > >>
> > > > >>
> > > > >> My current goal is to start freezing the main branch of Calcite by
> > > > >> the
> > > > >> end
> > > > >> of this week.
> > > > >>
> > > > >> Please let me know if you have any questions.
> > > > >>
> > > > >> [1]:
> > > > >>
> > > > >>
> > > > >>
> > > > >>
> > > > >>
> > > > >>
> > > >
> > >
> >
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4941?jql=project%20%3D%20CALCITE%20AND%20status%20in%20(Open%2C%20%22In%20Progress%22)%20AND%20fixVersion%20%3D%201.29.0
> > > > >>
> > > > >>
> > > > >> -Rui
> > > > >>
> > > > >>
> > > > >>
> > > > >>
> > > > >>
> > > > >>
> > > > >>
> > > > >> --
> > > > >> Francesco Gini
> > > > >>
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
>

Reply via email to