Ah, I see Stamatis has Log4j covered: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4950 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4950>.
> On Dec 18, 2021, at 10:17 AM, Julian Hyde <[email protected]> wrote: > > I think we should skip CALCITE-4907. There’s still discussion in its PR, > https://github.com/apache/calcite/pull/2620 > <https://github.com/apache/calcite/pull/2620>. I promise we’ll get it in soon > after the release. > > In other news, there’s a new Log4j version, 2.17, addressing a new CVE[1]. > Let’s get that in. > > Julian > > [1] > https://thehackernews.com/2021/12/apache-issues-3rd-patch-to-fix-new-high.html > > <https://thehackernews.com/2021/12/apache-issues-3rd-patch-to-fix-new-high.html> > >> On Dec 18, 2021, at 6:58 AM, Vladimir Ozerov <[email protected] >> <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: >> >> Hi Xiong, >> >> Thank you very much. >> >> Vladimir. >> >> Сб, 18 дек. 2021 г. в 14:32, xiong duan <[email protected] >> <mailto:[email protected]>>: >> >>> Hi Vladimir, >>> >>> I have merged. >>> >>> Vladimir Ozerov <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> >>> 于2021年12月18日周六 16:58写道： >>> >>>> Hi Xiong, >>>> >>>> I've just resolved the conflicts. >>>> >>>> Regards, >>>> Vladimir. >>>> >>>> сб, 18 дек. 2021 г. в 10:48, xiong duan <[email protected] >>>> <mailto:[email protected]>>: >>>> >>>>> Hi, Vladimir. >>>>> >>>>> The PR[https://github.com/apache/calcite/pull/2464 >>>>> <https://github.com/apache/calcite/pull/2464>] looks good. If you >>>>> have >>>>> free time Please resolve the conflicts. Then we can merge it. >>>>> >>>>> Vladimir Ozerov <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> >>>>> 于2021年12月18日周六 15:20写道： >>>>> >>>>>> Hi, >>>>>> >>>>>> Could you please also merge >>>>>> https://github.com/apache/calcite/pull/2464 >>>>>> <https://github.com/apache/calcite/pull/2464> ? I guess it got stuck >>>>>> somehow, >>>>>> as all the comments are addressed. This issue forced us to create a >>>> copy >>>>> of >>>>>> the AggregateUnionTransposeRule in our project. >>>>>> >>>>>> Regards, >>>>>> Vladimir >>>>>> >>>>>> Сб, 18 дек. 2021 г. в 09:51, Rui Wang <[email protected] >>>>>> <mailto:[email protected]>>: >>>>>> >>>>>>> Thanks Julian! >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Now we will just decide whether to merge CALCITE-4907 or not, then >>> I >>>>> will >>>>>>> lock the main branch and start the release process. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> -Rui >>>>>>> >>>>>>> On Fri, Dec 17, 2021 at 10:29 PM Julian Hyde < >>> [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> >>>>> >>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Rui, I have merged CALCITE-4946. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> On Dec 17, 2021, at 10:21 PM, Rui Wang <[email protected]> >>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Thanks Zhe. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Hi Francesco, >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> I left a comment in your PR. Can you take a look? >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> -Rui >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> On Fri, Dec 17, 2021 at 3:32 PM Zhe Hu <[email protected]> >>> wrote: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Hi, Rui. >>>>>>>>>> CALCITE-4860 will be fixed in next release, you can pass it >>>>>> currently. >>>>>>>>>> Thanks for your work! >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Best, >>>>>>>>>> ZheHu >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> On 12/18/2021 06:08，Francesco Gini<[email protected]> >>>>> wrote： >>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4907 is in >>>> review. >>>>> I >>>>>>>> believe >>>>>>>>>> I have addressed all the comments. Let me know if I missed >>>>> anything. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> On Fri, 17 Dec 2021 at 22:42, Jacques Nadeau < >>>> [email protected]> >>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> I've merged CALCITE-4948 to mitigate the concerns around >>>>>> CALCITE-4898 >>>>>>>> and >>>>>>>>>> maven repositories and category x licenses. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> On Fri, Dec 17, 2021 at 1:02 PM Rui Wang < >>> [email protected]> >>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> For the list of 1.29 fix Jira, several Jira have been marked >>> as >>>>>>> resolved >>>>>>>>>> since this Monday. I will do another pass today but probably >>> not >>>>> all >>>>>>>>>> those >>>>>>>>>> will make the 1.29.0 release. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> -Rui >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> On Fri, Dec 17, 2021 at 11:57 AM Ruben Q L <[email protected] >>>> >>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Hello, >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> FYI https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4737 has >>> been >>>>>>>>>> merged. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Regards, >>>>>>>>>> Ruben >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> On Fri, Dec 17, 2021 at 7:40 PM Julian Hyde < >>>>> [email protected] >>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Rui, >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Even though >>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4898 >>>> < >>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4898> is marked >>>>>> fixed, >>>>>>>>>> there’s some fallout regarding maven repositories and category >>>> X. >>>>>>>>>> That >>>>>>>>>> needs to be sorted out before RC0. See [1]. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> I’m working on getting >>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4946 >>>>>>>>>> <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4946> done >>>> today. >>>>>>>>>> Please >>>>>>>>>> wait for that. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4885 < >>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4885> is a big >>>>>>>>>> refactoring >>>>>>>>>> and, though I’d love to get it in before the release, it isn’t >>>>> going >>>>>>>>>> to >>>>>>>>>> happen. Don’t wait for it. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> I also see the following as open or in progress and >>> fix-in-1.29: >>>>>>>>>> * https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4872 < >>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4872> (Will >>>> Noble) >>>>>>>>>> * https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4908 < >>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4908> (Woonsan >>>> Koo) >>>>>>>>>> * https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4704 < >>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4704> >>> (Stamatis) >>>>>>>>>> * https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4737 < >>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4737> (Thomas >>>>> Rebele) >>>>>>>>>> * https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4860 < >>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4860> (Zhe Hu / >>>>> Duan >>>>>>>>>> Xiong) >>>>>>>>>> * https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4907 < >>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4907> >>> (Francesco >>>>>> Gini) >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> What’s the status on those? >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Julian >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> [1] https://github.com/apache/calcite/pull/2622 < >>>>>>>>>> https://github.com/apache/calcite/pull/2622> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> PS It feels churlish to bring this up, but in time-honored >>>>> tradition >>>>>>>>>> the >>>>>>>>>> email subject has been ‘[DISCUSS] Towards Calcite x.y.z’. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> On Dec 14, 2021, at 10:37 AM, Rui Wang <[email protected]> >>>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Hi community, >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> To prepare for Calcite 1.29.0 release, I will start to check >>> the >>>>>>>>>> JIRA >>>>>>>>>> list >>>>>>>>>> [1] which marks its fix version as 1.29.0 (9 JIRA as of now >>>>> remains >>>>>>>>>> open/in >>>>>>>>>> progress) and also the pending PRs which looks promising to be >>>>>>>>>> merged. >>>>>>>>>> Please help resolve/review/merge JIRA/PRs if you want some >>> fixes >>>>> to >>>>>>>>>> be >>>>>>>>>> released. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> My current goal is to start freezing the main branch of >>> Calcite >>>> by >>>>>>>>>> the >>>>>>>>>> end >>>>>>>>>> of this week. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Please let me know if you have any questions. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> [1]: >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4941?jql=project%20%3D%20CALCITE%20AND%20status%20in%20(Open%2C%20%22In%20Progress%22)%20AND%20fixVersion%20%3D%201.29.0 >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> -Rui >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> -- >>>>>>>>>> Francesco Gini >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>> >
