I think we should skip CALCITE-4907. There’s still discussion in its PR, https://github.com/apache/calcite/pull/2620 <https://github.com/apache/calcite/pull/2620>. I promise we’ll get it in soon after the release.
In other news, there’s a new Log4j version, 2.17, addressing a new CVE[1]. Let’s get that in. Julian [1] https://thehackernews.com/2021/12/apache-issues-3rd-patch-to-fix-new-high.html > On Dec 18, 2021, at 6:58 AM, Vladimir Ozerov <[email protected]> wrote: > > Hi Xiong, > > Thank you very much. > > Vladimir. > > Сб, 18 дек. 2021 г. в 14:32, xiong duan <[email protected]>: > >> Hi Vladimir, >> >> I have merged. >> >> Vladimir Ozerov <[email protected]> 于2021年12月18日周六 16:58写道： >> >>> Hi Xiong, >>> >>> I've just resolved the conflicts. >>> >>> Regards, >>> Vladimir. >>> >>> сб, 18 дек. 2021 г. в 10:48, xiong duan <[email protected]>: >>> >>>> Hi, Vladimir. >>>> >>>> The PR[https://github.com/apache/calcite/pull/2464] looks good. If you >>>> have >>>> free time Please resolve the conflicts. Then we can merge it. >>>> >>>> Vladimir Ozerov <[email protected]> 于2021年12月18日周六 15:20写道： >>>> >>>>> Hi, >>>>> >>>>> Could you please also merge >>>>> https://github.com/apache/calcite/pull/2464 ? I guess it got stuck >>>>> somehow, >>>>> as all the comments are addressed. This issue forced us to create a >>> copy >>>> of >>>>> the AggregateUnionTransposeRule in our project. >>>>> >>>>> Regards, >>>>> Vladimir >>>>> >>>>> Сб, 18 дек. 2021 г. в 09:51, Rui Wang <[email protected]>: >>>>> >>>>>> Thanks Julian! >>>>>> >>>>>> Now we will just decide whether to merge CALCITE-4907 or not, then >> I >>>> will >>>>>> lock the main branch and start the release process. >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> -Rui >>>>>> >>>>>> On Fri, Dec 17, 2021 at 10:29 PM Julian Hyde < >> [email protected] >>>> >>>>>> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> Rui, I have merged CALCITE-4946. >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> On Dec 17, 2021, at 10:21 PM, Rui Wang <[email protected]> >>>> wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Thanks Zhe. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Hi Francesco, >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> I left a comment in your PR. Can you take a look? >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> -Rui >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> On Fri, Dec 17, 2021 at 3:32 PM Zhe Hu <[email protected]> >> wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Hi, Rui. >>>>>>>>> CALCITE-4860 will be fixed in next release, you can pass it >>>>> currently. >>>>>>>>> Thanks for your work! >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Best, >>>>>>>>> ZheHu >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> On 12/18/2021 06:08，Francesco Gini<[email protected]> >>>> wrote： >>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4907 is in >>> review. >>>> I >>>>>>> believe >>>>>>>>> I have addressed all the comments. Let me know if I missed >>>> anything. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> On Fri, 17 Dec 2021 at 22:42, Jacques Nadeau < >>> [email protected]> >>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> I've merged CALCITE-4948 to mitigate the concerns around >>>>> CALCITE-4898 >>>>>>> and >>>>>>>>> maven repositories and category x licenses. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> On Fri, Dec 17, 2021 at 1:02 PM Rui Wang < >> [email protected]> >>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> For the list of 1.29 fix Jira, several Jira have been marked >> as >>>>>> resolved >>>>>>>>> since this Monday. I will do another pass today but probably >> not >>>> all >>>>>>>>> those >>>>>>>>> will make the 1.29.0 release. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> -Rui >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> On Fri, Dec 17, 2021 at 11:57 AM Ruben Q L <[email protected] >>> >>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Hello, >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> FYI https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4737 has >> been >>>>>>>>> merged. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Regards, >>>>>>>>> Ruben >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> On Fri, Dec 17, 2021 at 7:40 PM Julian Hyde < >>>> [email protected] >>>>>> >>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Rui, >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Even though >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4898 >>> < >>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4898> is marked >>>>> fixed, >>>>>>>>> there’s some fallout regarding maven repositories and category >>> X. >>>>>>>>> That >>>>>>>>> needs to be sorted out before RC0. See [1]. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> I’m working on getting >>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4946 >>>>>>>>> <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4946> done >>> today. >>>>>>>>> Please >>>>>>>>> wait for that. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4885 < >>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4885> is a big >>>>>>>>> refactoring >>>>>>>>> and, though I’d love to get it in before the release, it isn’t >>>> going >>>>>>>>> to >>>>>>>>> happen. Don’t wait for it. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> I also see the following as open or in progress and >> fix-in-1.29: >>>>>>>>> * https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4872 < >>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4872> (Will >>> Noble) >>>>>>>>> * https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4908 < >>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4908> (Woonsan >>> Koo) >>>>>>>>> * https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4704 < >>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4704> >> (Stamatis) >>>>>>>>> * https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4737 < >>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4737> (Thomas >>>> Rebele) >>>>>>>>> * https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4860 < >>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4860> (Zhe Hu / >>>> Duan >>>>>>>>> Xiong) >>>>>>>>> * https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4907 < >>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4907> >> (Francesco >>>>> Gini) >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> What’s the status on those? >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Julian >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> [1] https://github.com/apache/calcite/pull/2622 < >>>>>>>>> https://github.com/apache/calcite/pull/2622> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> PS It feels churlish to bring this up, but in time-honored >>>> tradition >>>>>>>>> the >>>>>>>>> email subject has been ‘[DISCUSS] Towards Calcite x.y.z’. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> On Dec 14, 2021, at 10:37 AM, Rui Wang <[email protected]> >>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Hi community, >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> To prepare for Calcite 1.29.0 release, I will start to check >> the >>>>>>>>> JIRA >>>>>>>>> list >>>>>>>>> [1] which marks its fix version as 1.29.0 (9 JIRA as of now >>>> remains >>>>>>>>> open/in >>>>>>>>> progress) and also the pending PRs which looks promising to be >>>>>>>>> merged. >>>>>>>>> Please help resolve/review/merge JIRA/PRs if you want some >> fixes >>>> to >>>>>>>>> be >>>>>>>>> released. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> My current goal is to start freezing the main branch of >> Calcite >>> by >>>>>>>>> the >>>>>>>>> end >>>>>>>>> of this week. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Please let me know if you have any questions. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> [1]: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>> >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4941?jql=project%20%3D%20CALCITE%20AND%20status%20in%20(Open%2C%20%22In%20Progress%22)%20AND%20fixVersion%20%3D%201.29.0 >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> -Rui >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> -- >>>>>>>>> Francesco Gini >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>> >>
