+1

Maybe it's also good time to review other components that have similar
variants.

On Thu, Jul 25, 2019 at 7:09 PM Alex Dettinger <aldettin...@gmail.com>
wrote:

> +1
>
> On Thu, Jul 25, 2019 at 12:02 PM Andrea Cosentino <anco...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> > +1
> >
> > Il giorno gio 25 lug 2019 alle ore 11:48 Claus Ibsen <
> > claus.ib...@gmail.com>
> > ha scritto:
> >
> > > Hi
> > >
> > > So what has been bothering Camel 2.x users is that when they use http
> > > they would likely use the camel-http4 component and then they should
> > > use http4 as the component name. The old camel-http component is
> > > deprecated as the http client it uses is EOL for many many years.
> > >
> > > So with Camel 3 on the way we have deleted the old camel-http
> > > component and the camel-http4 component now has both http and http4 as
> > > component names.
> > >
> > > I think we should rename the camel-http4 back to camel-http and then
> > > favour using http as the component name, and then deprecate http4 (or
> > > even remove it).
> > >
> > > Any thoughts?
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > Claus Ibsen
> > > -----------------
> > > http://davsclaus.com @davsclaus
> > > Camel in Action 2: https://www.manning.com/ibsen2
> > >
> >
>

Reply via email to