On Thu, Jul 25, 2019 at 12:24 PM Tadayoshi Sato <sato.tadayo...@gmail.com> wrote: > > +1 > > Maybe it's also good time to review other components that have similar > variants. >
Yeah we have - camel-quartz2 - camel-netty4 - camel-netty4-http - camel-mongodb3 - camel-mina2 - camel-hdfs2 - camel-rxjava2 - camel-sjms2 > On Thu, Jul 25, 2019 at 7:09 PM Alex Dettinger <aldettin...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > > +1 > > > > On Thu, Jul 25, 2019 at 12:02 PM Andrea Cosentino <anco...@gmail.com> > > wrote: > > > > > +1 > > > > > > Il giorno gio 25 lug 2019 alle ore 11:48 Claus Ibsen < > > > claus.ib...@gmail.com> > > > ha scritto: > > > > > > > Hi > > > > > > > > So what has been bothering Camel 2.x users is that when they use http > > > > they would likely use the camel-http4 component and then they should > > > > use http4 as the component name. The old camel-http component is > > > > deprecated as the http client it uses is EOL for many many years. > > > > > > > > So with Camel 3 on the way we have deleted the old camel-http > > > > component and the camel-http4 component now has both http and http4 as > > > > component names. > > > > > > > > I think we should rename the camel-http4 back to camel-http and then > > > > favour using http as the component name, and then deprecate http4 (or > > > > even remove it). > > > > > > > > Any thoughts? > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > Claus Ibsen > > > > ----------------- > > > > http://davsclaus.com @davsclaus > > > > Camel in Action 2: https://www.manning.com/ibsen2 > > > > > > > > > -- Claus Ibsen ----------------- http://davsclaus.com @davsclaus Camel in Action 2: https://www.manning.com/ibsen2
