+1 --- Luca Burgazzoli
On Thu, Jul 25, 2019 at 1:58 PM Francois Papon <francois.pa...@openobject.fr> wrote: > Agree, it make sense! > > regards, > > François > fpa...@apache.org > > Le 25/07/2019 à 12:23, Tadayoshi Sato a écrit : > > +1 > > > > Maybe it's also good time to review other components that have similar > > variants. > > > > On Thu, Jul 25, 2019 at 7:09 PM Alex Dettinger <aldettin...@gmail.com> > > wrote: > > > >> +1 > >> > >> On Thu, Jul 25, 2019 at 12:02 PM Andrea Cosentino <anco...@gmail.com> > >> wrote: > >> > >>> +1 > >>> > >>> Il giorno gio 25 lug 2019 alle ore 11:48 Claus Ibsen < > >>> claus.ib...@gmail.com> > >>> ha scritto: > >>> > >>>> Hi > >>>> > >>>> So what has been bothering Camel 2.x users is that when they use http > >>>> they would likely use the camel-http4 component and then they should > >>>> use http4 as the component name. The old camel-http component is > >>>> deprecated as the http client it uses is EOL for many many years. > >>>> > >>>> So with Camel 3 on the way we have deleted the old camel-http > >>>> component and the camel-http4 component now has both http and http4 as > >>>> component names. > >>>> > >>>> I think we should rename the camel-http4 back to camel-http and then > >>>> favour using http as the component name, and then deprecate http4 (or > >>>> even remove it). > >>>> > >>>> Any thoughts? > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> -- > >>>> Claus Ibsen > >>>> ----------------- > >>>> http://davsclaus.com @davsclaus > >>>> Camel in Action 2: https://www.manning.com/ibsen2 > >>>> >
