Agree, it make sense! regards,
François fpa...@apache.org Le 25/07/2019 à 12:23, Tadayoshi Sato a écrit : > +1 > > Maybe it's also good time to review other components that have similar > variants. > > On Thu, Jul 25, 2019 at 7:09 PM Alex Dettinger <aldettin...@gmail.com> > wrote: > >> +1 >> >> On Thu, Jul 25, 2019 at 12:02 PM Andrea Cosentino <anco...@gmail.com> >> wrote: >> >>> +1 >>> >>> Il giorno gio 25 lug 2019 alle ore 11:48 Claus Ibsen < >>> claus.ib...@gmail.com> >>> ha scritto: >>> >>>> Hi >>>> >>>> So what has been bothering Camel 2.x users is that when they use http >>>> they would likely use the camel-http4 component and then they should >>>> use http4 as the component name. The old camel-http component is >>>> deprecated as the http client it uses is EOL for many many years. >>>> >>>> So with Camel 3 on the way we have deleted the old camel-http >>>> component and the camel-http4 component now has both http and http4 as >>>> component names. >>>> >>>> I think we should rename the camel-http4 back to camel-http and then >>>> favour using http as the component name, and then deprecate http4 (or >>>> even remove it). >>>> >>>> Any thoughts? >>>> >>>> >>>> -- >>>> Claus Ibsen >>>> ----------------- >>>> http://davsclaus.com @davsclaus >>>> Camel in Action 2: https://www.manning.com/ibsen2 >>>>
