+1 to ACCP
> On Jun 22, 2023, at 3:05 PM, C. Scott Andreas <sc...@paradoxica.net> wrote:
>
> +1 for ACCP and can attest to its results. ACCP also optimizes for a range of
> hash functions and other cryptographic primitives beyond TLS acceleration for
> Netty.
>
>> On Jun 22, 2023, at 2:07 PM, Jeff Jirsa <jji...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>
>> Either would be better than today.
>>
>> On Thu, Jun 22, 2023 at 1:57 PM Jordan West <jw...@apache.org
>> <mailto:jw...@apache.org>> wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> I’m wondering if there is appetite to change the default SSL provider for
>>> Cassandra going forward to either ACCP [1] or tc-native in Netty? Our
>>> deployment as well as others I’m aware of make this change in their fork
>>> and it can lead to significant performance improvement. When recently
>>> qualifying 4.1 without using ACCP (by accident) we noticed p99 latencies
>>> were 2x higher than 3.0 w/ ACCP. Wiring up ACCP can be a bit of a pain and
>>> also requires some amount of customization. I think it could be great for
>>> the wider community to adopt it.
>>>
>>> The biggest hurdle I foresee is licensing but ACCP is Apache 2.0 licensed.
>>> Anything else I am missing before opening a JIRA and submitting a patch?
>>>
>>> Jordan
>>>
>>>
>>> [1]
>>> https://github.com/corretto/amazon-corretto-crypto-provider
>
>
