Mike, Sorry, I misunderstood you. I thought you were going to put it at the top-level of SVN, not Git.
With Git we have a different repository model. Instead of one huge SVN tree that contains everything from the source code to sandbox to site pages, Git is normally split into smaller repos. So https://github.com/apache/cayenne corresponds to the former “main” folder under http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/cayenne/ . My suggestion would be to move board-reports to SVN. What do you think? Andrus On Sep 3, 2014, at 1:10 AM, Michael Gentry <mgen...@masslight.net> wrote: > Put the draft at board-reports/2014-09.md if anyone wants to review it. It > is in Markdown format, so it should render well on GitHub, too. > > I also added the previous two (March and June), but wasn't planning on > going back through my emails to add anything before 2014 unless anyone > objects. > > Thanks, > > mrg > > > > On Tue, Sep 2, 2014 at 10:40 AM, Michael Gentry <mgen...@masslight.net> > wrote: > >> OK, I'll start on September's there. Thanks! >> >> >> On Tue, Sep 2, 2014 at 10:24 AM, Andrus Adamchik <and...@objectstyle.org> >> wrote: >> >>>> how about "board-reports" at the top level? >>> >>> I’d say go for it. >>> >>> On Sep 2, 2014, at 5:16 PM, Michael Gentry <mgen...@masslight.net> wrote: >>> >>>> Was there a specific location in the repo created to put board >>> reports? If >>>> not, how about "board-reports" at the top level? >>>> >>>> Thanks, >>>> >>>> mrg >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> On Mon, Jun 16, 2014 at 4:05 AM, Andrus Adamchik < >>> and...@objectstyle.org> >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>>> If we want it to be published on the website - then yes. I am not sure >>> we >>>>> do. But I won’t object to it either. >>>>> >>>>> Andrus >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> On Jun 16, 2014, at 10:59 AM, Aristedes Maniatis <a...@maniatis.org> >>> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> Should it be in svn as part of our website? That makes some sense. >>>>>> >>>>>> Ari >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> On 16/06/2014 4:57pm, Andrus Adamchik wrote: >>>>>>> Cool. I’ll see what we need to do to pull it down. And let’s plan to >>>>> write the next report in SVN (or maybe we should request a new Git >>> repo for >>>>> it?) >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Andrus >>>>>>> >>>>>>> On Jun 13, 2014, at 4:39 PM, Michael Gentry <mgen...@masslight.net> >>>>> wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Welcome Andrus. We talked about ditching the Wiki the previous >>> board >>>>> report and I'm OK with that. As your screenshot shows, it looks pretty >>>>> awful. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> mrg >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> On Thu, Jun 12, 2014 at 1:07 PM, Andrus Adamchik < >>>>> and...@objectstyle.org> wrote: >>>>>>>> Thanks Mike for preparing the report. I edited the Git note and will >>>>> submit the report in a few minutes. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Going forward, I think we should do away with our wiki, and check >>>>> reports to SVN as text files. The wiki rendering is broken, and there’s >>>>> really no reason to work on fixing it.Andrus >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> On Jun 9, 2014, at 6:20 PM, Michael Gentry <mgen...@masslight.net> >>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Please review/comment: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CAY/Board+Report+June+2014 >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> My biggest question was about the Git migration. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Thanks, >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> mrg >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> -- >>>>>> --------------------------> >>>>>> Aristedes Maniatis >>>>>> GPG fingerprint CBFB 84B4 738D 4E87 5E5C 5EFA EF6A 7D2E 3E49 102A >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>> >>> >>
