Well, here is the current draft (which is also available in Git until I can delete it) in Markdown format:
# Apache Cayenne Board Report - September 2014 Apache Cayenne is a Java persistence framework. It takes a distinct approach to object persistence and provides an ORM runtime, remote persistence services, and a GUI mapping/modeling tool. ## Project Status * Preparations are underway for Cayenne 3.1 Final (Release Candidate 1 was released on Feb 18). * New feature development continues for Cayenne 3.2. * Git migration has completed (for 3.2 only, previous revisions remain in Subversion). As a result of the migration, we have received pull requests via GitHub which opens up new avenues for developers to contribute. * Confluence "CAY" space deleted since it was not used. ## Community * Mailing list activity is about average on developer and user lists. * The last PMC member was added in December 2012. * The last committer was added in May 2012. On Wed, Sep 3, 2014 at 2:45 PM, Andrus Adamchik <and...@objectstyle.org> wrote: > Yeah :-/ > > ~: svn mkdir http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/cayenne/board-reports -m > "board reports" > svn: E175013: POST of '/repos/asf/!svn/me': 403 Forbidden ( > http://svn.apache.org) > > I know that http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/cayenne/site/ is writable - > that's our website, and CMS doesn't even work with Git. I assumed other > folders except for main are available for writing. I was wrong. > > I will probably just ask Infra to create a separate Git repo for reports. > Maybe we call it "cayenne-pmc" just in case we need to place something > there that is not a board report in the future. > > For now I see no problem if we collaborate on the report using email and > this list. > > Andrus > > > On Sep 3, 2014, at 9:24 PM, Michael Gentry <mgen...@masslight.net> wrote: > > > Well, according to our website: > > > > "For archival purposes SVN repository is still available in a read-only > > mode" > > > > And when I just tried to add the reports to SVN, I received: > > > > svn: Commit failed (details follow): > > svn: Server sent unexpected return value (403 Forbidden) in response to > > MKACTIVITY request for > > '/repos/asf/!svn/act/be340dff-489e-479c-9c44-4367a994a635' > > > > > > So, I'm guessing SVN really is read-only? > > > > mrg > > > > > > On Wed, Sep 3, 2014 at 5:11 AM, Andrus Adamchik <and...@objectstyle.org> > > wrote: > > > >> Mike, > >> > >> Sorry, I misunderstood you. I thought you were going to put it at the > >> top-level of SVN, not Git. > >> > >> With Git we have a different repository model. Instead of one huge SVN > >> tree that contains everything from the source code to sandbox to site > >> pages, Git is normally split into smaller repos. So > >> https://github.com/apache/cayenne corresponds to the former “main” > folder > >> under http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/cayenne/ . > >> > >> My suggestion would be to move board-reports to SVN. > >> > >> What do you think? > >> > >> Andrus > >> > >> On Sep 3, 2014, at 1:10 AM, Michael Gentry <mgen...@masslight.net> > wrote: > >> > >>> Put the draft at board-reports/2014-09.md if anyone wants to review > >> it. It > >>> is in Markdown format, so it should render well on GitHub, too. > >>> > >>> I also added the previous two (March and June), but wasn't planning on > >>> going back through my emails to add anything before 2014 unless anyone > >>> objects. > >>> > >>> Thanks, > >>> > >>> mrg > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> On Tue, Sep 2, 2014 at 10:40 AM, Michael Gentry <mgen...@masslight.net > > > >>> wrote: > >>> > >>>> OK, I'll start on September's there. Thanks! > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> On Tue, Sep 2, 2014 at 10:24 AM, Andrus Adamchik < > >> and...@objectstyle.org> > >>>> wrote: > >>>> > >>>>>> how about "board-reports" at the top level? > >>>>> > >>>>> I’d say go for it. > >>>>> > >>>>> On Sep 2, 2014, at 5:16 PM, Michael Gentry <mgen...@masslight.net> > >> wrote: > >>>>> > >>>>>> Was there a specific location in the repo created to put board > >>>>> reports? If > >>>>>> not, how about "board-reports" at the top level? > >>>>>> > >>>>>> Thanks, > >>>>>> > >>>>>> mrg > >>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>>> On Mon, Jun 16, 2014 at 4:05 AM, Andrus Adamchik < > >>>>> and...@objectstyle.org> > >>>>>> wrote: > >>>>>> > >>>>>>> If we want it to be published on the website - then yes. I am not > >> sure > >>>>> we > >>>>>>> do. But I won’t object to it either. > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> Andrus > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> On Jun 16, 2014, at 10:59 AM, Aristedes Maniatis <a...@maniatis.org > > > >>>>> wrote: > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> Should it be in svn as part of our website? That makes some sense. > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> Ari > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> On 16/06/2014 4:57pm, Andrus Adamchik wrote: > >>>>>>>>> Cool. I’ll see what we need to do to pull it down. And let’s plan > >> to > >>>>>>> write the next report in SVN (or maybe we should request a new Git > >>>>> repo for > >>>>>>> it?) > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> Andrus > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> On Jun 13, 2014, at 4:39 PM, Michael Gentry < > mgen...@masslight.net > >>> > >>>>>>> wrote: > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>> Welcome Andrus. We talked about ditching the Wiki the previous > >>>>> board > >>>>>>> report and I'm OK with that. As your screenshot shows, it looks > >> pretty > >>>>>>> awful. > >>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>> mrg > >>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>> On Thu, Jun 12, 2014 at 1:07 PM, Andrus Adamchik < > >>>>>>> and...@objectstyle.org> wrote: > >>>>>>>>>> Thanks Mike for preparing the report. I edited the Git note and > >> will > >>>>>>> submit the report in a few minutes. > >>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>> Going forward, I think we should do away with our wiki, and > check > >>>>>>> reports to SVN as text files. The wiki rendering is broken, and > >> there’s > >>>>>>> really no reason to work on fixing it.Andrus > >>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>> On Jun 9, 2014, at 6:20 PM, Michael Gentry < > mgen...@masslight.net > >>> > >>>>>>> wrote: > >>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>> Please review/comment: > >>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>> > >> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CAY/Board+Report+June+2014 > >>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>> My biggest question was about the Git migration. > >>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>> Thanks, > >>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>> mrg > >>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> -- > >>>>>>>> --------------------------> > >>>>>>>> Aristedes Maniatis > >>>>>>>> GPG fingerprint CBFB 84B4 738D 4E87 5E5C 5EFA EF6A 7D2E 3E49 102A > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>> > >> > >> > >
