FWIW, we can even use GoogleDocs and destroy them after report submission :)
On Sep 3, 2014, at 9:45 PM, Andrus Adamchik <and...@objectstyle.org> wrote: > Yeah :-/ > > ~: svn mkdir http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/cayenne/board-reports -m "board > reports" > svn: E175013: POST of '/repos/asf/!svn/me': 403 Forbidden > (http://svn.apache.org) > > I know that http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/cayenne/site/ is writable - > that's our website, and CMS doesn't even work with Git. I assumed other > folders except for main are available for writing. I was wrong. > > I will probably just ask Infra to create a separate Git repo for reports. > Maybe we call it "cayenne-pmc" just in case we need to place something there > that is not a board report in the future. > > For now I see no problem if we collaborate on the report using email and this > list. > > Andrus > > > On Sep 3, 2014, at 9:24 PM, Michael Gentry <mgen...@masslight.net> wrote: > >> Well, according to our website: >> >> "For archival purposes SVN repository is still available in a read-only >> mode" >> >> And when I just tried to add the reports to SVN, I received: >> >> svn: Commit failed (details follow): >> svn: Server sent unexpected return value (403 Forbidden) in response to >> MKACTIVITY request for >> '/repos/asf/!svn/act/be340dff-489e-479c-9c44-4367a994a635' >> >> >> So, I'm guessing SVN really is read-only? >> >> mrg >> >> >> On Wed, Sep 3, 2014 at 5:11 AM, Andrus Adamchik <and...@objectstyle.org> >> wrote: >> >>> Mike, >>> >>> Sorry, I misunderstood you. I thought you were going to put it at the >>> top-level of SVN, not Git. >>> >>> With Git we have a different repository model. Instead of one huge SVN >>> tree that contains everything from the source code to sandbox to site >>> pages, Git is normally split into smaller repos. So >>> https://github.com/apache/cayenne corresponds to the former “main” folder >>> under http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/cayenne/ . >>> >>> My suggestion would be to move board-reports to SVN. >>> >>> What do you think? >>> >>> Andrus >>> >>> On Sep 3, 2014, at 1:10 AM, Michael Gentry <mgen...@masslight.net> wrote: >>> >>>> Put the draft at board-reports/2014-09.md if anyone wants to review >>> it. It >>>> is in Markdown format, so it should render well on GitHub, too. >>>> >>>> I also added the previous two (March and June), but wasn't planning on >>>> going back through my emails to add anything before 2014 unless anyone >>>> objects. >>>> >>>> Thanks, >>>> >>>> mrg >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> On Tue, Sep 2, 2014 at 10:40 AM, Michael Gentry <mgen...@masslight.net> >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>>> OK, I'll start on September's there. Thanks! >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> On Tue, Sep 2, 2014 at 10:24 AM, Andrus Adamchik < >>> and...@objectstyle.org> >>>>> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>>> how about "board-reports" at the top level? >>>>>> >>>>>> I’d say go for it. >>>>>> >>>>>> On Sep 2, 2014, at 5:16 PM, Michael Gentry <mgen...@masslight.net> >>> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> Was there a specific location in the repo created to put board >>>>>> reports? If >>>>>>> not, how about "board-reports" at the top level? >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Thanks, >>>>>>> >>>>>>> mrg >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> On Mon, Jun 16, 2014 at 4:05 AM, Andrus Adamchik < >>>>>> and...@objectstyle.org> >>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> If we want it to be published on the website - then yes. I am not >>> sure >>>>>> we >>>>>>>> do. But I won’t object to it either. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Andrus >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> On Jun 16, 2014, at 10:59 AM, Aristedes Maniatis <a...@maniatis.org> >>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Should it be in svn as part of our website? That makes some sense. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Ari >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> On 16/06/2014 4:57pm, Andrus Adamchik wrote: >>>>>>>>>> Cool. I’ll see what we need to do to pull it down. And let’s plan >>> to >>>>>>>> write the next report in SVN (or maybe we should request a new Git >>>>>> repo for >>>>>>>> it?) >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Andrus >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> On Jun 13, 2014, at 4:39 PM, Michael Gentry <mgen...@masslight.net >>>> >>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Welcome Andrus. We talked about ditching the Wiki the previous >>>>>> board >>>>>>>> report and I'm OK with that. As your screenshot shows, it looks >>> pretty >>>>>>>> awful. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> mrg >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> On Thu, Jun 12, 2014 at 1:07 PM, Andrus Adamchik < >>>>>>>> and...@objectstyle.org> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> Thanks Mike for preparing the report. I edited the Git note and >>> will >>>>>>>> submit the report in a few minutes. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Going forward, I think we should do away with our wiki, and check >>>>>>>> reports to SVN as text files. The wiki rendering is broken, and >>> there’s >>>>>>>> really no reason to work on fixing it.Andrus >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> On Jun 9, 2014, at 6:20 PM, Michael Gentry <mgen...@masslight.net >>>> >>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Please review/comment: >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CAY/Board+Report+June+2014 >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> My biggest question was about the Git migration. >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks, >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> mrg >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> -- >>>>>>>>> --------------------------> >>>>>>>>> Aristedes Maniatis >>>>>>>>> GPG fingerprint CBFB 84B4 738D 4E87 5E5C 5EFA EF6A 7D2E 3E49 102A >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>> >>> >>> > >
