Yeah :-/ ~: svn mkdir http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/cayenne/board-reports -m "board reports" svn: E175013: POST of '/repos/asf/!svn/me': 403 Forbidden (http://svn.apache.org)
I know that http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/cayenne/site/ is writable - that's our website, and CMS doesn't even work with Git. I assumed other folders except for main are available for writing. I was wrong. I will probably just ask Infra to create a separate Git repo for reports. Maybe we call it "cayenne-pmc" just in case we need to place something there that is not a board report in the future. For now I see no problem if we collaborate on the report using email and this list. Andrus On Sep 3, 2014, at 9:24 PM, Michael Gentry <mgen...@masslight.net> wrote: > Well, according to our website: > > "For archival purposes SVN repository is still available in a read-only > mode" > > And when I just tried to add the reports to SVN, I received: > > svn: Commit failed (details follow): > svn: Server sent unexpected return value (403 Forbidden) in response to > MKACTIVITY request for > '/repos/asf/!svn/act/be340dff-489e-479c-9c44-4367a994a635' > > > So, I'm guessing SVN really is read-only? > > mrg > > > On Wed, Sep 3, 2014 at 5:11 AM, Andrus Adamchik <and...@objectstyle.org> > wrote: > >> Mike, >> >> Sorry, I misunderstood you. I thought you were going to put it at the >> top-level of SVN, not Git. >> >> With Git we have a different repository model. Instead of one huge SVN >> tree that contains everything from the source code to sandbox to site >> pages, Git is normally split into smaller repos. So >> https://github.com/apache/cayenne corresponds to the former “main” folder >> under http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/cayenne/ . >> >> My suggestion would be to move board-reports to SVN. >> >> What do you think? >> >> Andrus >> >> On Sep 3, 2014, at 1:10 AM, Michael Gentry <mgen...@masslight.net> wrote: >> >>> Put the draft at board-reports/2014-09.md if anyone wants to review >> it. It >>> is in Markdown format, so it should render well on GitHub, too. >>> >>> I also added the previous two (March and June), but wasn't planning on >>> going back through my emails to add anything before 2014 unless anyone >>> objects. >>> >>> Thanks, >>> >>> mrg >>> >>> >>> >>> On Tue, Sep 2, 2014 at 10:40 AM, Michael Gentry <mgen...@masslight.net> >>> wrote: >>> >>>> OK, I'll start on September's there. Thanks! >>>> >>>> >>>> On Tue, Sep 2, 2014 at 10:24 AM, Andrus Adamchik < >> and...@objectstyle.org> >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>>>> how about "board-reports" at the top level? >>>>> >>>>> I’d say go for it. >>>>> >>>>> On Sep 2, 2014, at 5:16 PM, Michael Gentry <mgen...@masslight.net> >> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> Was there a specific location in the repo created to put board >>>>> reports? If >>>>>> not, how about "board-reports" at the top level? >>>>>> >>>>>> Thanks, >>>>>> >>>>>> mrg >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> On Mon, Jun 16, 2014 at 4:05 AM, Andrus Adamchik < >>>>> and...@objectstyle.org> >>>>>> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> If we want it to be published on the website - then yes. I am not >> sure >>>>> we >>>>>>> do. But I won’t object to it either. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Andrus >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> On Jun 16, 2014, at 10:59 AM, Aristedes Maniatis <a...@maniatis.org> >>>>> wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Should it be in svn as part of our website? That makes some sense. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Ari >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> On 16/06/2014 4:57pm, Andrus Adamchik wrote: >>>>>>>>> Cool. I’ll see what we need to do to pull it down. And let’s plan >> to >>>>>>> write the next report in SVN (or maybe we should request a new Git >>>>> repo for >>>>>>> it?) >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Andrus >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> On Jun 13, 2014, at 4:39 PM, Michael Gentry <mgen...@masslight.net >>> >>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Welcome Andrus. We talked about ditching the Wiki the previous >>>>> board >>>>>>> report and I'm OK with that. As your screenshot shows, it looks >> pretty >>>>>>> awful. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> mrg >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> On Thu, Jun 12, 2014 at 1:07 PM, Andrus Adamchik < >>>>>>> and...@objectstyle.org> wrote: >>>>>>>>>> Thanks Mike for preparing the report. I edited the Git note and >> will >>>>>>> submit the report in a few minutes. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Going forward, I think we should do away with our wiki, and check >>>>>>> reports to SVN as text files. The wiki rendering is broken, and >> there’s >>>>>>> really no reason to work on fixing it.Andrus >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> On Jun 9, 2014, at 6:20 PM, Michael Gentry <mgen...@masslight.net >>> >>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Please review/comment: >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CAY/Board+Report+June+2014 >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> My biggest question was about the Git migration. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Thanks, >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> mrg >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> -- >>>>>>>> --------------------------> >>>>>>>> Aristedes Maniatis >>>>>>>> GPG fingerprint CBFB 84B4 738D 4E87 5E5C 5EFA EF6A 7D2E 3E49 102A >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>> >> >>
