>> As such - I do not see a material difference in how the projects that >> are already using translate.a.o and how we function. >> > > Do we bring it up to legal-discuss ? I am happy to do so. >
What question would we ask? I see two possible questions, let me know if that isn't the case. If the question is 'Is accepting contributions from a plethora of contributors to a project specific instance an acceptable way of doing business' I think the answer is obvious that translate.a.o does exactly that mechanism and there seem to be no issues from a process standpoint. If the question is 'Can the Transifex Apache CloudStack l10n projects serve as an official contribution point' - I personally am comfortable saying that the message is currently clear that we treat them as official. I also don't see a problem with doing so. Is this a point of contention with anyone else? Is there a problem there that I am not seeing? Is there another question?
