"Leszek Gawron" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Carsten Ziegeler wrote: > > > > > Which is not a good place to discuss :) > So I will repeat my proposal here. My idea is to implement (nearly done) > a continuations manager that has 3 levels of security: > - standard (current functionality) > - continuations invalidated along with session, still the continuation > is reachable from other sessions (or no session at all) > - fully isolated. only the session that created the continuation can > access it. > > For my web applications I would surely go for for full isolation so I > would like to have this option in cocoon core (so I do not have to patch > every of my projects). > > Is there any sense to bind continuations to the sitemap? Vadim? > Yes, I really think so. IMHO it is simply wrong to continue a script in a sitemap where it hasn't been declared - and as soon as the flow script tries to address relative resources it won't work anyway.
> I am very eager to provide a new production quality continuations > manager as soon as the final solution gets agreed upon. > Great! Carsten
