Leszek Gawron wrote: > >>Is there any sense to bind continuations to the sitemap? Vadim? > >> > > > > Yes, I really think so. IMHO it is simply wrong to continue > a script > > in a sitemap where it hasn't been declared - and as soon as > the flow > > script tries to address relative resources it won't work anyway. > > Just one more question: should this be an option to maintain > compatibility? > I don't think so, imho it's a bug - in most cases the script breaks as soon as a pipeline is invoked - or other relative resources are fetched.
Carsten
