Carsten Ziegeler wrote:
"Leszek Gawron" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Carsten Ziegeler wrote:
Which is not a good place to discuss :)
So I will repeat my proposal here. My idea is to implement (nearly done) a continuations manager that has 3 levels of security:
- standard (current functionality)
- continuations invalidated along with session, still the continuation is reachable from other sessions (or no session at all)
- fully isolated. only the session that created the continuation can access it.
For my web applications I would surely go for for full isolation so I would like to have this option in cocoon core (so I do not have to patch every of my projects).
Is there any sense to bind continuations to the sitemap? Vadim?
Yes, I really think so. IMHO it is simply wrong to continue a script in a sitemap where it hasn't been declared - and as soon as the flow script tries
to address relative resources it won't work anyway.
Just one more question: should this be an option to maintain compatibility?
-- Leszek Gawron [EMAIL PROTECTED] Project Manager MobileBox sp. z o.o. +48 (61) 855 06 67 http://www.mobilebox.pl mobile: +48 (501) 720 812 fax: +48 (61) 853 29 65
