Vadim Gritsenko wrote: > > Joerg Heinicke wrote: > > On 20.10.2004 20:07, Carsten Ziegeler wrote: > > > >> IMHO it is simply wrong to continue a script in a sitemap where it > >> hasn't been declared - and as soon as the flow script tries to > >> address relative resources it won't work anyway. > > > > But how should binding a continuation to the sitemap solve > the problem? > > You are always forced to divide your application into two > parts (i.e. > > sitemaps), one that is protected, one unprotected. Or am I wrong? > > If you mean issue in subject - yes, you'll have to have two > different sitemaps, one protected and one public. But I > already mentioned this earlier in the thread. > Yepp, these are two different concerns.
Carsten
