Grzegorz Kossakowski wrote: > Steven Dolg pisze: > >> > >> I second this ask. Bombing us with patches that are not discussed here > >> is what we all want to avoid. > >> > > The number of patches from Simone hardly qualifies for being called > > "bombing". Actually the issue mentioned has exactly one patch. > > > > Furthermore I doubt every single change needs to be discussed here > > before it is made. > > Something as straightforward as "cache the XSLT to avoid parsing it > > every single time the pipeline is executed" is IMO one of those things > > that should be obvious to everyone. > > The idea is obvious, the implementation details as we can see are not so > obvious. > > > Especially since - as Sylvain pointed out - "this feature has been > > available in Cocoon for ages". > > Yep, but if the sequence of events had been a little bit different then the > patch wouldn't have to > be rewritten. The idea is not to write detailed plan that is almost > comparable with final > implementation but simple saying "I'm going to implement this and this, using > this and this. If > someone wants to comment. Go ahead." > > A few sentences, right?
I too was concerned when i saw new patches to re-implement something that Cocoon has already spent years developing. A little bit of discussion is a good thing. It enables the rest of the community to feel that they are still in touch with the direction of the project. -David > > Not everyone is fond of reading long emails that sketch a vague picture. > > A clear description of the problem, a suggested solution and a patch > > that provides a working implementation is IMO sometimes preferable. > > Everyone is able to have a look at the jira issues and the posted > > patch(es) and comment on them just like Sylvain did. > > After studying recent issues on COCOON3 I have to admit that level of > discussions has increased > which makes me happy. There are several reasons why things should be > discussed here. > > One of them is that one can grasp what has happened during his offline period. > > As for now let's move on more specific things. I'd like to hear your opinion > on functional sitemap, > Steven! > > -- > Grzegorz
