> -----Original Message----- > From: Julius Davies [mailto:juliusdav...@gmail.com] > Sent: Friday, July 24, 2009 1:47 PM > To: Commons Developers List > Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Codec 1.4 based on RC2 > > Probably the Maven2 generated Jar is okay in this department? > > Here's the MANIFEST.MF created by Maven2 (I'm using trunk to create the > jar): >
Snip... > > Here's the MANIFEST.MF created by ant: > Snip... > > I don't think missing OSGI headers in the Ant generated jar is a big deal. > > +1 for RC2 from me. > > > yours, > > Julius > I for one would appreciate OSGI information in the Ant generated jar, if it's not too much trouble to make the jars consistent no matter how you generate them. Thanks. -- Mat Booth A: Because it destroys the order of the conversation. Q: Why shouldn't you do it? A: Posting your reply above the original message. Q: What is top-posting? --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
