On Sun, Jul 26, 2009 at 11:47 PM, Mat Booth<fed...@matbooth.co.uk> wrote: >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Niall Pemberton [mailto:niall.pember...@gmail.com] >> Sent: Sunday, July 26, 2009 11:11 AM >> To: Commons Developers List >> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Codec 1.4 based on RC2 >> >> On Sun, Jul 26, 2009 at 5:05 PM, Mat Booth<fed...@matbooth.co.uk> wrote: >> > >> > I for one would appreciate OSGI information in the Ant generated jar, >> >> Why? > > Partly because of a need to build commons-codec from source > (distribution packaging rules [1]) and I'd rather not deviate from the > upstream distribution by adding my own manifest file to the resulting > jar and partly because (rather selfishly) ant is the build system I > know and can debug because I use it for work. >
Upon further investigation it appears we don't yet have all the maven bits and pieces in Fedora yet to build it that way. So for now, we'll have to continue using the ant build and adding in our own manifest file. As I say, I'd rather not deviate from your distribution, but I'll continue doing so if OSGI information isn't generated during the ant build. Thanks for looking into it. -- Mat Booth A: Because it destroys the order of the conversation. Q: Why shouldn't you do it? A: Posting your reply above the original message. Q: What is top-posting? --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
