On Sun, Jul 26, 2009 at 5:05 PM, Mat Booth<fed...@matbooth.co.uk> wrote: >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Julius Davies [mailto:juliusdav...@gmail.com] >> Sent: Friday, July 24, 2009 1:47 PM >> To: Commons Developers List >> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Codec 1.4 based on RC2 >> >> Probably the Maven2 generated Jar is okay in this department? >> >> Here's the MANIFEST.MF created by Maven2 (I'm using trunk to create the >> jar): >> > > Snip... > >> >> Here's the MANIFEST.MF created by ant: >> > > Snip... > >> >> I don't think missing OSGI headers in the Ant generated jar is a big deal. >> >> +1 for RC2 from me. >> >> >> yours, >> >> Julius >> > > > I for one would appreciate OSGI information in the Ant generated jar,
Why? Niall > if it's not too much trouble to make the jars consistent no matter how > you generate them. > > Thanks. > > > -- > Mat Booth --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
