Hm... I just noticed that VFS follows a different import convention that other [commons] projects.
In [lang] and [io] for example, we list java packages first and the project's packages last. In VFS, it's the reverse. Consistency would be nice. Time to match [lang] and [io]? Time to wiki this as a guideline? Too micro? Gary > -----Original Message----- > From: Ralph Goers [mailto:ralph.go...@dslextreme.com] > Sent: Tuesday, November 30, 2010 12:00 > To: Commons Developers List > Subject: Re: VFS release > > > On Nov 30, 2010, at 8:40 AM, Gary Gregory wrote: > > > Hi All: > > > > I've removed unused imports. > > > > Any objection to organizing imports consistently? > > > > Actually, those all show up in the checkstyle report. The ones you changed > are all a consequence of the recent changes I made. I'd missed those but would > have caught that the next time I ran checkstyle, although I haven't been > paying much attention to the sandbox or examples projects. > > Ralph > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
