Ok, I've added some entries here: http://wiki.apache.org/commons/CodeStyle
See the latest VFS commits for this order of imports: java, javax, org, com. Same as [io] and [lang]. Gary > -----Original Message----- > From: Ralph Goers [mailto:ralph.go...@dslextreme.com] > Sent: Tuesday, November 30, 2010 14:43 > To: Commons Developers List > Subject: Re: VFS release > > > On Nov 30, 2010, at 9:28 AM, sebb wrote: > > > On 30 November 2010 17:16, Gary Gregory <ggreg...@seagullsoftware.com> > wrote: > >> Hm... I just noticed that VFS follows a different import convention that > other [commons] projects. > >> > >> In [lang] and [io] for example, we list java packages first and the > project's packages last. In VFS, it's the reverse. Consistency would be nice. > Time to match [lang] and [io]? > > > > OK by me. > > > >> Time to wiki this as a guideline? Too micro? > > > > IMO, that would be fine as a guideline. Makes it a bit easier when > > adding new code. > > I usually have IntelliJ add the imports. I have no idea what controls the > order it chooses. As long as like packages are grouped I really don't care > what the order is. > > > > > If there are currently no guidelines on imports, I would add: > > * never use wildcard imports, except perhaps for static imports of > constants. > > That is also reported as an error by checkstyle. > > Ralph > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
