On Mon, Feb 1, 2016 at 8:24 AM, Gilles <gil...@harfang.homelinux.org> wrote:
> On Mon, 1 Feb 2016 06:20:14 -0700, Phil Steitz wrote:
>>
>> Unscientifically, but in the interest of keeping things moving, it
>> looks to me like just plain "math" is the winner.  Any objections to
>> moving forward with this name?
>>
>> Phil
>
>
> Proposals were not all presented when people gave opinions.
> A [VOTE] perhaps?
>
> Actually: Who should vote, or not?
> [Logic would have it that people they do not intend to join
> development of the new project should not...]

Users have a huge stake in the name. They will be the ones trying to
remember the project name when adding it as a dependency, after all.

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org

Reply via email to