On Fri, Dec 1, 2017 at 6:56 PM, Gilles <gil...@harfang.homelinux.org> wrote:
> Hello Amey. Hi Gilles, > > > On Thu, 30 Nov 2017 23:45:45 +0530, Amey Jadiye wrote: > >> Pardon me for pulling this thread up again, I havent read anything about >> "Commons Geometry" since long >> > > Thanks for your renewed interest. > > (or may be I missed any other disscussion? ). >> > > Probably not. > > is someone working on this ? >> > > It would be a surprise. > > what is the final decision ? >> > > There hasn't been any progress towards a decision. > I'm not sure if "Lazy Consensus" works in these matters ? better take help of it, its fast and easy. > There isn't even a consensus on one of the central tenets of > Apache ("Those who do the work..."): how sad/strange (?). > > I'm having good >> amount of time to spend on this now, appreciate If someone direct me to >> correct disscussion thread >> > > IIRC, the one below is where we left off... > > I think I can help here. >> > > Thanks for the offer! > > It took me half hour to read all old mails but dont see final verdict, >> though I was in favour with Maven modules but after reading all again I >> think Gilles approch is more practicle here and If no one is working I can >> submit something to review. >> > > IMHO, the priority would be to review the status of "Numbers" > (i.e. what is preventing a first release?). > Ok, If commons number is priority let me check that first, I will chime in here after that release. last numbers release I see on 22/4/17, and total open jiras are 18, what are min expectation here ? I will open another thread If want advise., let this thread alive for o.a.c.geometry. Regards, Amey > Best regards, > Gilles > > > > Regards, >> Amey >> >> On Wed, Sep 13, 2017 at 4:44 AM, Gilles <gil...@harfang.homelinux.org> >> wrote: >> >> On Tue, 12 Sep 2017 13:07:24 +0200, Jochen Wiedmann wrote: >>> >>> On Sat, Sep 2, 2017 at 12:50 AM, Gilles <gil...@harfang.homelinux.org> >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>> Because of "Commons" rules, it is not "equivalent": There was >>>> >>>>> a long thread concluding that all modules must be released >>>>> _together_, and with the same top-level package name and version >>>>> number. >>>>> It is very "maintainer(s)-unfriendly" because of the quite >>>>> different subject matters that coexist in CM. >>>>> >>>>> >>>> I wouldn't count that rule "*all* modules must be released" as a mantra: >>>> >>>> >>> I found the idea attractive, but Stian (link to older discussion >>> in a previous post) advised that maven would not easily "support" >>> it. >>> >>> Has that changed since the discussion took place (10 months ago)? >>> >>> a) In case of an emergency release (fixing a CVE, for example), I'd >>> >>>> clearly consider pushing out the module as more important than waiting >>>> for a full release. (Of course, one must be careful to maintain >>>> compatibility when pushing out just a module, but that goes without >>>> saying.) >>>> b) I'd like to hear others experiences on that topic (maybe VFS). >>>> Anyways, my personal experiences with Rat are clear: Releasing *all* >>>> together is causing nothing but pain, and tends to defer releases >>>> indefinitely. OTOH, releasing a submodule can be done at all times, >>>> and without overly much preparation. >>>> >>>> In conclusion, I'd definitely support the release of a single >>>> submodule, if the need would arise. >>>> >>>> >>> How can one reconcile what you say here with what was said in >>> that old thread? >>> >>> Would the PMC accept that a component contains independent modules >>> (where "independent" means that each module can have its own version >>> number, irrespective of the component's version)? >>> >>> Arguably (cf. thread referred to above), a "Commons" component >>> should be simple enough that multiple versions are not necessary. >>> [Chorus:] This is not the case with "Commons Math", hence separate >>> components for independent contents (such as "Geometry", "RNG", >>> "Numbers" and "SigProc") is the simplest solution. >>> >>> Gilles >>> >>> Jochen >>> >>>> >>>> > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org > > -- --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org