Le mar. 31 mars 2020 à 17:24, sebb <seb...@gmail.com> a écrit : > > On Tue, 31 Mar 2020 at 16:04, Gilles Sadowski <gillese...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > Le mar. 31 mars 2020 à 16:47, Gary Gregory <garydgreg...@gmail.com> a écrit > > : > > > > > > On Tue, Mar 31, 2020 at 10:39 AM Gilles Sadowski <gillese...@gmail.com> > > > wrote: > > > > > > > Le mar. 31 mars 2020 à 15:59, Gary Gregory <garydgreg...@gmail.com> a > > > > écrit : > > > > > > > > > > On Tue, Mar 31, 2020 at 8:27 AM Gilles Sadowski <gillese...@gmail.com> > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > Le mar. 31 mars 2020 à 14:11, sebb <seb...@gmail.com> a écrit : > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Mon, 30 Mar 2020 at 23:20, Gilles Sadowski > > > > > > > <gillese...@gmail.com> > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Hi. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Le lun. 30 mars 2020 à 23:37, Matt Juntunen > > > > > > > > <matt.juntu...@hotmail.com> a écrit : > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Thanks. I think I have the gpg key sorted now. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I can probably start on RC2 tomorrow. It sounds like we've > > > > agreed to > > > > > > go with "1.0-beta1" for the release version so I'm wondering what > > > > > > to do > > > > > > with the existing release branch (1.0-B1-release) and tag > > > > > > (NUMBERS_1_0_B1_RC1). These should have probably been > > > > 1.0-beta1-release and > > > > > > NUMBERS_1_0_BETA1_RC1. Is it possible to drop those and recreate > > > > > > them > > > > or > > > > > > would it be better to leave the current branch and tag names as-is > > > > > > and > > > > use > > > > > > the NUMBER_1_0_BETA1_RCX tag pattern going forward? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > IMO, the tagging should be: > > > > > > > > > > <component-id>-<release>[-RC#] > > > > > > > > > > So: > > > > > > > > > > commons-number-1.0-beta1-RC1 > > > > > commons-number-1.0-beta1 > > > > > > > > > > > > > For [Math] and [RNG] (and [Lang] until 3.10), > > > > $ git tag --list > > > > shows a format akin to > > > > MATH_3_6_1_RC > > > > > > > > > > I know and my opinion is that the format above is lame ;-) > > > > I didn't particularly liked it either but I'm quite sure that it > > wouldn't have sufficed for a change. > > > > I'm fine with improving the (common?) convention. > > > > Why not dropping the redundant reference to the component > > and project, since they are in the repo's name? > > And how about focusing on the tag's purpose by mentioning > > it first? > > Thus: > > rc1_v1.0-beta1 > > Please don't - sort order will be affected.
v1.0-beta1_rc1 ? Gilles --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
