> > [...] > > I'm fine with improving the (common?) convention. > > > > Why not dropping the redundant reference to the component > > and project, since they are in the repo's name? > > And how about focusing on the tag's purpose by mentioning > > it first? > > Thus: > > rc1_v1.0-beta1 > > > > The argument for having the component name in the tag name is that when you > clone the repo, you get a 'nice' directory name by default. >
Convincing. So, I suggest commons-numbers_v1.0-beta1_rc1 i.e. <component id>_v<version>[-beta<m>]_rc<n> OK? Gilles --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
