On Tue, Mar 31, 2020 at 3:16 PM Gilles Sadowski <gillese...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > [...] > > > I'm fine with improving the (common?) convention. > > > > > > Why not dropping the redundant reference to the component > > > and project, since they are in the repo's name? > > > And how about focusing on the tag's purpose by mentioning > > > it first? > > > Thus: > > > rc1_v1.0-beta1 > > > > > > > The argument for having the component name in the tag name is that when > you > > clone the repo, you get a 'nice' directory name by default. > > > > Convincing. > > So, I suggest > > commons-numbers_v1.0-beta1_rc1 > For me, I find the mix of - and _ lame and since we use - in component names, I prefer -'s for all separators. Gary > > i.e. > > <component id>_v<version>[-beta<m>]_rc<n> > > OK? > > Gilles > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org > >
