Suppose we take the following example:

https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/c99519e1c8e0a4af5be02f40e8e44b408cbc3d4568a334f3a400b94f%40%3Cdev.commons.apache.org%3E

This is Commons Daemon 1.2.0 based on RC2.

Take for example:

https://archive.apache.org/dist/commons/daemon/source/commons-daemon-1.2.0-native-src.tar.gz
with sha256:
13c8d9b27d38ae1ced1fb37743239035cd1add74a8ef20bfce38386fc0b4a243
*commons-daemon-1.2.0-native-src.tar.gz

How does one show that it is the same source that was voted on?

Also the Maven jar:

commons-daemon-1.2.0.jar
sha1:
a3a42da759a94a0522fe4b867ac2f5d0d58cc0a9

Sebb.

On Mon, 7 Sep 2020 at 14:16, Gilles Sadowski <gillese...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Hello.
>
> > > [...]
> > > see an explanation for why it is necessary
> > > (or even helpful) to include artefact hashes in the vote mail.
> > >
> > I agree and understand all your points here.
>
> Well, I don't.
> An explanation would be useful indeed.
>
> > > Validating the svn revision for the dist repo [ ... vs ...]
> > > comparing the hashes of each file to a hash provided in
> > > the vote email. [...]
> >
> > I was merely trying to offer the opposing perspective of the other folks.
>
> Aren't we talking about a *requirement*?
> Referring to the "executive summary" above (as I understand it),
> from Mark's edited text, which information is necessary and sufficient
> for a vote?
>
> Also, isn't this discussion a rehash of my (recurrent) question
> about whether the hash checks should be automated?
> [I mean, isn't it sufficient that the RM would indicate in the vote
> email that the hash values stored in the "dist" area are the same
> as those generated by the build?]
>
> Regards,
> Gilles
>
> > > > [...]
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
>

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org

Reply via email to