On 17/04/15 08:26, Sergio Fernández wrote:
OK (the issue seems to mix contract requirements and implementation, >though any likely implementation has not very much room for manoeuvre as >far as I can see)The question is: can we keep it as it it for 0.1 and work on it for the next version/s?
Not a blocker for 0.1 from my POV.
Andy
