OK, as far as I see: https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?jql=project%20%3D%20COMMONSRDF%20AND%20resolution%20%3D%20Unresolved%20ORDER%20BY%20fixVersion%20ASC%2C%20key%20ASC%2C%20priority%20DESC
we have in out backlog: * COMMONSRDF-6 is the most important issue to address before the release, and personally I'm happy woth the current proposal from Stian. Any other opinion? * COMMONSRDF-9 should be fine as there is not much we can do until Commons fixes a bug. * There are some things that are not clearly a priority (COMMONSRDF-9) * All the other ongoing discussions (COMMONSRDF-7, COMMONSRDF-14, COMMONSRDF-17, etc) can be shifted to 0.2 On Tue, Apr 21, 2015 at 4:50 PM, Sergio Fernández <[email protected]> wrote: > I kindly ask everybody to focus on this topic. We have to move on, I have > the impression that's not the case. > > If I do not get any feedback in the next 48h hours, I'll cast a vote with > the current code to be released. > > Thanks. > > > On Fri, Apr 17, 2015 at 12:26 PM, Sergio Fernández <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> On Fri, Apr 17, 2015 at 12:23 PM, Andy Seaborne <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>> Not a blocker for 0.1 from my POV. >>> >> >> And for the rest of us? >> >> -- >> Sergio Fernández >> Partner Technology Manager >> Redlink GmbH >> m: +43 6602747925 >> e: [email protected] >> w: http://redlink.co >> > > > > -- > Sergio Fernández > Partner Technology Manager > Redlink GmbH > m: +43 6602747925 > e: [email protected] > w: http://redlink.co > -- Sergio Fernández Partner Technology Manager Redlink GmbH m: +43 6602747925 e: [email protected] w: http://redlink.co
