On 23/04/15 09:08, Sergio Fernández wrote:
OK, as far as I see:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?jql=project%20%3D%20COMMONSRDF%20AND%20resolution%20%3D%20Unresolved%20ORDER%20BY%20fixVersion%20ASC%2C%20key%20ASC%2C%20priority%20DESC
we have in out backlog:
* COMMONSRDF-6 is the most important issue to address before the release,
and personally I'm happy with the current proposal from Stian. Any other
opinion?
I don't like making last-minute changes on such a sensitive area,
Full comments made on COMMONSRDF-6
TL;DR; Suggested rename: internalIdentifier() -> reference()
* COMMONSRDF-9 should be fine as there is not much we can do until Commons
fixes a bug.
* There are some things that are not clearly a priority (COMMONSRDF-9)
* All the other ongoing discussions (COMMONSRDF-7, COMMONSRDF-14,
COMMONSRDF-17, etc) can be shifted to 0.2
I found one link from API to simple (in package-info)
Better is to make the API not refer to "simple" at all.
Andy
On Tue, Apr 21, 2015 at 4:50 PM, Sergio Fernández <[email protected]> wrote:
I kindly ask everybody to focus on this topic. We have to move on, I have
the impression that's not the case.
If I do not get any feedback in the next 48h hours, I'll cast a vote with
the current code to be released.
Thanks.
On Fri, Apr 17, 2015 at 12:26 PM, Sergio Fernández <[email protected]>
wrote:
On Fri, Apr 17, 2015 at 12:23 PM, Andy Seaborne <[email protected]> wrote:
Not a blocker for 0.1 from my POV.
And for the rest of us?
--
Sergio Fernández
Partner Technology Manager
Redlink GmbH
m: +43 6602747925
e: [email protected]
w: http://redlink.co
--
Sergio Fernández
Partner Technology Manager
Redlink GmbH
m: +43 6602747925
e: [email protected]
w: http://redlink.co
