Hi, On Thu, Apr 23, 2015 at 4:37 PM, Andy Seaborne <[email protected]> wrote:
> On 23/04/15 09:08, Sergio Fernández wrote: >> >> * COMMONSRDF-6 is the most important issue to address before the release, >> and personally I'm happy with the current proposal from Stian. Any other >> opinion? >> > > I don't like making last-minute changes on such a sensitive area, > > Full comments made on COMMONSRDF-6 > TL;DR; Suggested rename: internalIdentifier() -> reference() For me it' s fine to wait some more time and get a consensus on the name. I'll discuss the issue in a particular thread. With COMMONSRDF-6 resolved we' d be ready to release. * COMMONSRDF-9 should be fine as there is not much we can do until Commons >> fixes a bug. > > I' ve just added some more missing content. And for me we can consider it resolved for now. The cosmetic issue with COMMONSSITE-82 is not blocker at all. I found one link from API to simple (in package-info) > > Better is to make the API not refer to "simple" at all. Strongly agree. Already removed by commit 0cc6525643a402eae50823c4efd1c63c7685b60f. Cheers, -- Sergio Fernández Partner Technology Manager Redlink GmbH m: +43 6602747925 e: [email protected] w: http://redlink.co
