On Thu, Dec 29, 2011 at 10:47 AM, Mike Kienenberger <mkien...@gmail.com> wrote: > I don't know if I'm subscribed to dev@community, so any future replies > may not reach me. > > Let me give you what I think is an equivalent analogy. > > Assume Microsoft sets up a community hosting site for projects related > to Microsoft products. > > Assume you are an employee of Microsoft. > > Assume that Microsoft states that, while they are providing the site, > you may not include "Microsoft" in your project name or use the > Microsoft branding, nor may you use "com.microsoft" as a java package. > > You, as an ASF member and PMC chair are equivalent to the employee in > this scenario. Even though you are an ASF member or PMC chair, you > do not have the right to use the company assets without permission. > In this case, the real permission you are seeking is the right to > release an Apache product that contains LGPL-licensed code. The > Apache Extras site isn't going to provide you a loophole to do this. > >
+1, org.apache code is official Apache code under Apache License. -- Luciano Resende http://people.apache.org/~lresende http://twitter.com/lresende1975 http://lresende.blogspot.com/
